!~~Show off your sig~~!

Pinecone · Post by **Pinecone** » 21 Nov 2005, 06:09

This should be a political debate, but apparently pabl0z thinks (In this day and age) we are using chemical weapons (l have no idea where that came from) for a resource. Oil is not what we are fighting for, and if you cant see beyond what the liberal media has clouded your mind with (Or even consider it) then you really don't have much of an argument.

Jopuma · Post by **Jopuma** » 21 Nov 2005, 06:17

Quite true. My only problem with us being over there is that our troops were there for about 4 years now. We originally went across the sea to get rid of Osama Bin Laden, but then we decided to take care of supposed weapons of mass destruction that were never even there. We did one good thing. We got rid of Saddam. That's all I can think of.

Now lets get back on topic before our @$$e$ GET BANNED!

The Gravedigger · Post by **The Gravedigger** » 21 Nov 2005, 06:17

Back on topic I bring.....

korge you're modified version of your sig looks very nice, as does your mod'ed avatar

Post by **Pabl0z** » 21 Nov 2005, 15:05

Pinecone wrote:This should be a political debate, but apparently pabl0z thinks (In this day and age) we are using chemical weapons (l have no idea where that came from) for a resource. Oil is not what we are fighting for, and if you cant see beyond what the liberal media has clouded your mind with (Or even consider it) then you really don't have much of an argument.

Oh i'm the one who has a clouded mind?
Well it has been proven that the U.S. has used light fosfors in Iraq which is concidered to be a chemical weapon. When those light fosfor bombs hit the ground it burns every animal and human within 150m or so.
And didn't the U.S. go to Iraq to find weapons of mass destruction?
Well where are they?
And the U.S. has promised not to use napalm but in Iraq have used bombs that have the exact same results.

korge, remove the sig or i'm gonna have a real debate about this.

korge · Post by **korge** » 21 Nov 2005, 16:07

Pabl0z wrote:
Pinecone wrote:This should be a political debate, but apparently pabl0z thinks (In this day and age) we are using chemical weapons (l have no idea where that came from) for a resource. Oil is not what we are fighting for, and if you cant see beyond what the liberal media has clouded your mind with (Or even consider it) then you really don't have much of an argument.
Oh i'm the one who has a clouded mind?
Well it has been proven that the U.S. has used light fosfors in Iraq which is concidered to be a chemical weapon. When those light fosfor bombs hit the ground it burns every animal and human within 150m or so.
And didn't the U.S. go to Iraq to find weapons of mass destruction?
Well where are they?
And the U.S. has promised not to use napalm but in Iraq have used bombs that have the exact same results.

korge, remove the sig or i'm gonna have a real debate about this.

I believe you mean Phosphors and it it just an incidernary that is used in flashbangs. You make no sense. It is quite obivous.

Post by **Pabl0z** » 21 Nov 2005, 17:36

Well i have this 20 minute story that is made by RAI i think which is a big Italian tv-station. I would gladly show you that clip if i had somewhere enough space to upload it. But probably even if you saw it you would just deny everything you see.
But remove the sig because i find it offensive, thank you.
Or should i make a political sig too?

korge · Post by **korge** » 21 Nov 2005, 17:41

Pabl0z wrote: But remove the sig because i find it offensive, thank you.
Or should i make a political sig too?

You are full of sht. My signature is patriotic and has nothing offenseive unless you are AntiAmerica.

Jopuma · Post by **Jopuma** » 21 Nov 2005, 17:42

Just shut up and close your eyes if you don't like it.

Just because you don't like it doesn't mean that he has to change it. If you don't like it just close your eyes until you're sure that you've scrolled past his message. Easiest thing in the world.

NOW LETS GET BACK ON TOPIC BEFORE THE MODS BAN SOMEONE IN ORDER TO MAKE US GO ON TOPIC!

Post by **Pabl0z** » 21 Nov 2005, 18:38

korge wrote:
Pabl0z wrote: But remove the sig because i find it offensive, thank you.
Or should i make a political sig too?
You are full of sht. My signature is patriotic and has nothing offenseive unless you are AntiAmerica.

You can't say i'm full of shiznit when you haven't seen the evidence i have.
And i'm not AntiAmerica, i'm against your war.
But now that our thoughts have come out we can probably drop this.
And i still hope you would remove your sig or i might drop in some day with a sig that says "Saddam is my hero".
(That was a joke if you didn't realize...)

Dragon-of-Rune · Post by **Dragon-of-Rune** » 21 Nov 2005, 21:18

New matching signature. What do you think?

korge · Post by **korge** » 21 Nov 2005, 21:58

It isnt as clear and crisp like your others, but the style is nice.. I still think your Ninja sig was best..

Pabloz. Your opinions on the War in Iraq have nothing to do with my signature, and if you are that much of an ass that you find a signature offenseive, maybe you might just have an insecurity problem.

Jopuma · Post by **Jopuma** » 21 Nov 2005, 22:03

Nice set DOR.

Looks very nice.

@ Pabl0z: And here is a bit of info my Finnish friend. Its not "our" war. It's Bush's war. And his alone. He started it so it can't be blamed on the innocent people of America for starting a war that never should have been started in the first place.

master m · Post by **master m** » 21 Nov 2005, 22:25

Just made me couple of new sigs. And the one I'm using at the moment is the best IMO.
What do you think

Just in case you're wondering what car it is, it's the Blitz R34 GTR.

Post by **Pabl0z** » 21 Nov 2005, 22:28

korge wrote:It isnt as clear and crisp like your others, but the style is nice.. I still think your Ninja sig was best..

Pabloz. Your opinions on the War in Iraq have nothing to do with my signature, and if you are that much of an ass that you find a signature offenseive, maybe you might just have an insecurity problem.

It has everything to do with your sig because your stating your oppinion about the war on it.
"We're freeing Iraq".
And i've removed my sig once because someone found it offensive.
And now your just starting to flame me.

korge · Post by **korge** » 21 Nov 2005, 22:30

master m wrote:Just made me couple of new sigs. And the one I'm using at the moment is the best IMO.
What do you think

Just in case you're wondering what car it is, it's the Blitz R34 GTR.

That is amazing. Keep this one ..Keep it!

Dragon-of-Rune · Post by **Dragon-of-Rune** » 21 Nov 2005, 22:31

korge wrote:It isnt as clear and crisp like your others, but the style is nice.. I still think your Ninja sig was best.

You mean my Tenchu Set. And i see that my signature's needs a bit more touch-ups after uploading i see some flaws in the coloring i did

Jopuma · Post by **Jopuma** » 21 Nov 2005, 22:37

I think it still looks quite good.

Pinecone · Post by **Pinecone** » 22 Nov 2005, 02:12

Pabl0z wrote:It has everything to do with your sig because your stating your oppinion about the war on it.
"We're freeing Iraq".
And i've removed my sig once because someone found it offensive.
And now your just starting to flame me.

First of all, the name of an operation is not an opinion, like Desert Storm. It may be before you dropped your balls but at that time Korge would have a signiture with the words "Operation Desert Storm". The name Iraqi freedom is beyond simple resources, it's about creating Democracy and giving the people in the Middle East as much oppurtunity as we have. You should be lucky as hell that our government dosnt take away your mother and sister to rape them, smoke expensive cigars and drive McLarens on our money. If you think thousands of years of oppression over there is justified, then so be it. I guess you deserve to be in a chain gang breaking rocks for twelve cents an hour.

Post by **Pabl0z** » 22 Nov 2005, 03:28

Pinecone wrote:
Pabl0z wrote:It has everything to do with your sig because your stating your oppinion about the war on it.
"We're freeing Iraq".
And i've removed my sig once because someone found it offensive.
And now your just starting to flame me.
First of all, the name of an operation is not an opinion, like Desert Storm. It may be before you dropped your balls but at that time Korge would have a signiture with the words "Operation Desert Storm". The name Iraqi freedom is beyond simple resources, it's about creating Democracy and giving the people in the Middle East as much oppurtunity as we have. You should be lucky as hell that our government dosnt take away your mother and sister to rape them, smoke expensive cigars and drive McLarens on our money. If you think thousands of years of oppression over there is justified, then so be it. I guess you deserve to be in a chain gang breaking rocks for twelve cents an hour.

Oh you're giving the people the same opportunities we have by dropping chemical bombs on them?
You're not believing anything i tell you even if you saw all the evidence i have seen so i won't even bother anymore.
I dunno how i could give you the video clip i have about the operations in Iraq but if you want some nice truths about 9/11 get your hands on this documentary:

http://www.911inplanesite.com/

You can find it easily as a torrent too.

That's all i'm gonna say about this for now and don't come questioning what i'm saying before you get your hands on the footage i've seen.
You should see all the aspects of things before joining a debate.
Hope i don't see any posts about this subject anymore.

Jopuma · Post by **Jopuma** » 22 Nov 2005, 03:53

I've read that site before and already know the truths that the government didn't want to do anything about stopping that. Plus I already know that it was our own military cargo planes that flew into the towers. There was a missle launcher on them that launched a missle into the building as it hit. That's what explains the large explosion right before the plane actually hit the tower.

And since you never mentioned the name of that footage that way we can find it I know you must probably be bluffing on that part.

bashderq · Post by **bashderq** » 22 Nov 2005, 03:58

A wee bit off topic arent we?

@DoR - wow, awesome set

EDIT: 1300 posts

Post by **Pabl0z** » 22 Nov 2005, 04:36

Jopuma wrote:I've read that site before and already know the truths that the government didn't want to do anything about stopping that. Plus I already know that it was our own military cargo planes that flew into the towers. There was a missle launcher on them that launched a missle into the building as it hit. That's what explains the large explosion right before the plane actually hit the tower.

And since you never mentioned the name of that footage that way we can find it I know you must probably be bluffing on that part.

You mean the part about Iraq?
Well i don't know what i should call the footage.
I think it's made by an Italian televion network called RAI.
And it's been shown on TV.
I could ask my brother where he got the clip the next time comes to visit.
And i'm glad to see even one American on this site that isn't buying the whitewashing they're showing on American TV.

korge · Post by **korge** » 22 Nov 2005, 04:45

Bashderqs sig took 15 minutes and 45 seconds away from my life so far.

Dragster · Post by **Dragster** » 22 Nov 2005, 08:42

Pabl0z and korge, please cut the Iraqi crap already?

korge · Post by **korge** » 22 Nov 2005, 18:41

Dragster wrote:Pabl0z and korge, please cut the Iraqi crap already?

Please tell him to stop bugging about it. I just ignore him, but for some reason, he acts like people care about his opinion on the war. Regardless, my signature stays as is.

NFSUnlimited.net

!Show off your sig!