What would you do to make MW better?

xHaZxMaTx · Post by **xHaZxMaTx** » 22 Jan 2006, 22:48

There is older the Mazda RX-7 Type R/FD3S which has the old Mazda logo on it, and the newer (released in '02)Type R Bathurst R which has the new logo on it. Those are the best pics of the '02 Bathurst, but you can see the new logo on the front and rear of the car.

RX-7 Type R/FD3S
<img src="http://turbocharged98.tripod.com/rx7.jpg">

2002 RX-7 Type R Bathurst R
<img src="http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/images/large/1070-2.jpg">
<img src="http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/images/large/1070-1.jpg">

TypeRRevo · Post by **TypeRRevo** » 22 Jan 2006, 22:51

no no you dont get its a tuned version they use the circle logo for the tuned one theres two types from the car that you just showed the new one im talking about was made 2005 in japan im not shure if it came out in the US.. and i havt seen the car hir in canada so i think its onley used in japan

xHaZxMaTx · Post by **xHaZxMaTx** » 22 Jan 2006, 22:54

TypeRRevo, if you want people to believe you need to provide proof. The most convincing proof is usually in the form of pictures. I spent almost an hour finding info & pics of those RX-7's, and all you can say is, "Nope." Sorry, that doesn't cut it.

Ok, this is getting way offtopic, if we're going to continue this, we need to do it somewhere else.

What would make MW better is better gameplay. It's the same thing over and over ad over and after about 5 BL members it gets kind of boring.

TypeRRevo · Post by **TypeRRevo** » 22 Jan 2006, 22:55

lol we should stop well im stoping hehhe because it is getting of topic

Ceano · Post by **Ceano** » 22 Jan 2006, 23:34

Here you guys can find all cars that Mazda has made and with a lot of good photos.

TypeRRevo · Post by **TypeRRevo** » 22 Jan 2006, 23:36

i already gave him a pic and the website of the 2005 RX-7

xHaZxMaTx · Post by **xHaZxMaTx** » 22 Jan 2006, 23:48

Thank you, Ceano, for proving my point. There is no 2005 RX-7 Spec-R. There is no 2005 RX-7. Only the 1976 RX-7, 1986 RX-7 GXL, 2000 RX-7 Type RZ, 2002 RX-7 Type R Bathurst R, and RX-7 Spirit R. And as you can plainly see, all year 2000+ have the new Mazda logo. Point proven, discussion over.

As for that website you PMed me, none of those RX-7's have any logos on them, and the first two are just some pthat eople bought and modded/tuned.

TypeRRevo · Post by **TypeRRevo** » 22 Jan 2006, 23:50

i gave you a website o well belive what ever you want

Lokix · Post by **Lokix** » 23 Jan 2006, 01:07

my main complaints about the game are the horrible physics and the "catch up" the AI does. it is complete and total BS that grazing a wall makes my car flip, and cop cars should NOT go flying 150 yards if i hit them at top speed. It is also BS that my supposed 50 second lead gets closed in under 5 seconds. If I am smart enough to cut thru the prison/hospital and the AI isnt they should not be able to catch up like that. I also hate that the AI can pit me and put me into the wall but i can barely make them budge when i slam into them. I want to see more customization and more vehicle choices. I understand they can't have every car in them due to lisencing restrictions, but they can ahve more options from the various manufactuers that do consent. I also would like to have an option or something so that everytime you start from a standstill you dont burn rubber. Its unrealistic and very annoying. Only an idiot would waste his tires doing that.

SKYLINE 266 · Post by **SKYLINE 266** » 23 Jan 2006, 03:17

spartan.dk wrote:Personally, I'd like in quick race, cop probability, and JUST A GAME TYPE, ONLY FOR COP CHASES. Like you can have your heat level, what car you choose, etc etc... And the difficulty, and also in 2-player mode! You can have one be the cop, one be the one getting chased, and the person as the cop can call in for a spikestrip... or a roadblock etc... man that'd be awesome. What would YOU do to make MW better.

Yeah !!! like in NFS: Hot Pursuit 2 .
I will put the tuning & upgrades posibilities for some bonus carz. I want my ss camaro with the best performance

!!!!! And ... limited fuel . Ok. The fuel will have a durability by time , or miles drived . ThatÂ´s a good idea for make da MW better. DonÂ´t ya think ,,ah ?

spartan.dk · Post by **spartan.dk** » 23 Jan 2006, 05:40

Offtopic - TypeR, don't question those who own Mazdas. Especially those with old and new ones.

Anyways, yeah Skyline, you're right, it'd be pretty cool. You go in free run, some guy fills up your tank, and then he's like "Fifty seven and sixty seven cents please." And then you drive into the little gas things and no debt needed. Muahahaha...

Post by **TheStig** » 23 Jan 2006, 09:15

Lokix, first the AI has a catch up system we know that already, yeah it can suck but he you have to live with it in this game.... other things like flying cop cars are there for amusement... if it was all realistic the fun would be over after the first crash (you would be on a standstill, and wrecked!)

And about the burnouts that is because you use a keyboard... ever tried to floor the pedal on a real car? (doubt you even have a licence, no offence) cause the keyboard does just that... floor the accelerator!

xHaZxMaTx · Post by **xHaZxMaTx** » 23 Jan 2006, 09:17

Ya, and it's a real pain in the ass when trying to get away from the cops, especially in Viper and Carerra GT's. Those things slide all over the freaking place and don't get any traction until you're going 80+ mph.

Post by **GT3x24x7** » 23 Jan 2006, 09:20

^^ Unlike RL, a little nitro gives you traction in MW. I always use a little dab outta the slow corners and from stops.

Bauke777 · Post by **Bauke777** » 23 Jan 2006, 13:50

spartan.dk wrote:What would you do to make MW better?

EA could make the game free of charge, that would certainly help

(hey I'm dutch, so I couldn't resist, sry

)

Kid Cro · Post by **Kid Cro** » 23 Jan 2006, 14:16

More customisation, more cars,PPL on the street!!!!
Car handling should be improved, Hey they are experts, so many games maded and still crappy things in game. If you do a burnout tires should at least have less traction or blow and behave like you did go over spikes. Gas stations are there but hey you cannot do nothing with it except break them. Put gas tanks in cars so we can fill our cars and oil replacing would give a game a plus. Neons WTF!!! Why did they move them?? Lights??? Mirrors??? But I think that they think on this way: The police option will keep them playing. So next NFS should be more customizable(Talking about cars). And some1 made a great list of cars on first page,those cars should definatly be in game.

xHaZxMaTx · Post by **xHaZxMaTx** » 23 Jan 2006, 14:20

Are you saying the handling is unrealistic, so make it better? You got it backwards my friend.

Lokix · Post by **Lokix** » 23 Jan 2006, 15:58

TheStig wrote:Lokix, first the AI has a catch up system we know that already, yeah it can suck but he you have to live with it in this game.... other things like flying cop cars are there for amusement... if it was all realistic the fun would be over after the first crash (you would be on a standstill, and wrecked!)

And about the burnouts that is because you use a keyboard... ever tried to floor the pedal on a real car? (doubt you even have a licence, no offence) cause the keyboard does just that... floor the accelerator!

I know you all know it has the catch up system... but the question is what would i change.. so i told you, and told you why.
I know the flying cop cars are there for fun but have you ever had one go flying and land right infront of you after you just plowed thru them? it gets kinda annoying.. they shouldnt go flying as far as they do, imo. I never said i wanted total realisim, but a bit more would be nice.
as for the burnouts.. EA should know that a majority of us dont have a steering wheel and pedal set to race with, so there should be something to compensate. I have, in fact, floored a car, I have been a liscenced driver for over 8 years, and when you actually just stomp the acellerator down you end up stalling more often than not.. if you want to burn out you dont take the pedal all the way down.

SkeeteRX7 · Post by **SkeeteRX7** » 23 Jan 2006, 17:58

I dunno.

1: Not all American cars are crap, just the majority of them. For example, look at the Cadillac XLR-V, the Pontiac Solstice GXP (MX-5 still better though), the Chevrolet Corvette Z51, the Chevrolet Corvette Z06, the Ford Mustang GT, and so on. They needed some muscle in my opinion, and they should have the 1969 Camaro SS 427, not the 1967 Camaro SS with it's smaller engine, and it should have been available in Career mode, as with some other muscle cars.

2: Where was Honda/Acura, Ferrari, or Nissan? The NSX and S2000 could have been useful cars for the game, and the EQ Civic Si/EQ Civic Type R would've been a great starting car. The F430, FXX, and Superamerica wouldv'e been great cars during the later parts of the game, and the 350z and 240sx would have been great tuners mid-game. Also, for makes that were in the game, why no MX-5 or Solstice as a starting car? Why no Lancer Evolution IX? Why not have a Corvette ZO6 instead of a stock Corvette? There were small details that could have made the game much better.

3: Fair AI, and cars that matched yours in a race. I mean, I had to race a Murcielago and a 911 (996) Turbo S in one of Izzy's races. What? I was still using Vic's Supra! I had to restart 15 times to win! Also, how come the Rhinos (Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT-8 trucks) could, in some situations, corner as well as the RX-8? I could understand if the GTOs or Corvettes could round the esses as well as the RX-8, but large SUV's? Also, if the catch-up could be toggled on/off, and a variable difficulty level for N00bs to NFS, to stop all of the complaints from n00bs that havent read the forum's posts yet.

That's all for now.

TypeRRevo · Post by **TypeRRevo** » 23 Jan 2006, 22:54

xHaZxMaTx wrote:Are you saying the handling is unrealistic, so make it better? You got it backwards my friend.

i dont know who said this that the car handiling is crap well its not go play NFS MW and then play NFSUw ull see that MW is more realistic then Underground2

spartan.dk · Post by **spartan.dk** » 23 Jan 2006, 22:56

No NFS series has realistic handling. So no argument about it.

TypeRRevo · Post by **TypeRRevo** » 23 Jan 2006, 23:19

well when i play underground 2 I have problems with the way the car moves when i use the wheels and paddles but in MW the car moves perfectly even if i move the wheel just a bit the car starts to move and in underground 2 its diffrent it doest react

SKYLINE 266 · Post by **SKYLINE 266** » 24 Jan 2006, 01:12

Kid Cro wrote:More customisation, more cars,PPL on the street!!!!
Car handling should be improved, Hey they are experts, so many games maded and still crappy things in game. If you do a burnout tires should at least have less traction or blow and behave like you did go over spikes. Gas stations are there but hey you cannot do nothing with it except break them. Put gas tanks in cars so we can fill our cars and oil replacing would give a game a plus. Neons WTF!!! Why did they move them?? Lights??? Mirrors??? But I think that they think on this way: The police option will keep them playing. So next NFS should be more customizable(Talking about cars). And some1 made a great list of cars on first page,those cars should definatly be in game.

may be great too , to make yours own carz have dammage , but of course with the many crashÂ´s that you have with the cops carz and the bloqueades your car will be a trash with wheels and a mad guy inside , hahaha!!! but it donÂ´t leave to
still a good idea , like the suspension , motor block , and another thinks can be dammaged , like in NFS : high stakes , do you remember , but we will make the most wanted in a rally game ( That you heve to take a special care of all the car parts for donÂ´t leave the race in the middle for performance problems ) and we donÂ´t wamt that , or yes we ...??

spartan.dk · Post by **spartan.dk** » 26 Jan 2006, 05:25

But also, MW would be expensive as hell, and EA isn't as cool as before.

Post by **TheStig** » 26 Jan 2006, 09:18

Lokix wrote: as for the burnouts.. EA should know that a majority of us dont have a steering wheel and pedal set to race with, so there should be something to compensate. I have, in fact, floored a car, I have been a liscenced driver for over 8 years, and when you actually just stomp the acellerator down you end up stalling more often than not.. if you want to burn out you dont take the pedal all the way down.

Every nfs game had the same caracteristics in all nfs games the cars did massive burnouts at the start or any acc from a standstill or almost standstill, be glad it isn't like NFS 5 cause you would have been in real trouble. cause the Porsches in that nfs game did not only burnout like crazy if you did not accelerate properly but they often went sideways because of the loss of traction.

making a burnout with a 400+ bhp car is not so difficult you don't even have to floor the pedal for it to loose all its power and start burning rubber.

You forgot that even with manual shifting the cars in the game still have a automatic gearbox. you can't stall the engine in the game.

ooh and you need to grow some skills, cause you don't have to be standing still burning rubber playing with your keyboard.
I play with keyboard also, but I use the manual option for shifting and the right rpm also helps alot

NFSUnlimited.net

What would you do to make MW better?

Re: What would you do to make MW better?

My problems with the game.