Need For Speed: Carbon

BenGAMES · Post by **BenGAMES** » 19 Nov 2006, 00:13

I don't like the idea that Eclipse '99 can't be edited...

darknight788 · Post by **darknight788** » 19 Nov 2006, 00:18

no one does, the best NFS game will be the one with ALL cars tuneable and able to be bought in career. IMO

manwe · Post by **manwe** » 19 Nov 2006, 11:27

maby if enough people agree about it and we tell EA, they'll make a patch for it

(doubt it, but...)

Andredew · Post by **Andredew** » 19 Nov 2006, 12:38

they wont, beacuse they're a bunch of loosers

BenGAMES · Post by **BenGAMES** » 19 Nov 2006, 12:47

They are really unfair. You, as a NFS fan, see a screenshot before the game comes with a Eclipse GSX and after a while, when the game comes out, you get surprised by the stupidity of the EA staff as they make it not tunable and all the fans wanted it back in the game so they can do that. Skyline, however, is tunable and available in Career! Why did they do that to us and Eclipse '99?

BrontoX · Post by **BrontoX** » 19 Nov 2006, 13:00

EA is becoming lazy as time goes by they make tons of stupid games instead of making few great games.
I wish Ubisoft had the licence cuz they make great games

Danyutz · Post by **Danyutz** » 19 Nov 2006, 13:52

This is so wrong, how can they ask for fee, in trade for some upgrades? Not good at all ..

BenGAMES · Post by **BenGAMES** » 19 Nov 2006, 18:45

they're really stupid... I wish I could say that to them, so they get angry and start crapping about how they take their whole lives to make a game so I zippy can enjoy the game.. well, I'd say I have a life, and because they don't, they should use their lots of free time to make a game worth something!

Andredew · Post by **Andredew** » 19 Nov 2006, 18:57

they don't actually care, because they make a lot of money out of all these endless series of games and they would profit less if they had to make one single good game

BenGAMES · Post by **BenGAMES** » 19 Nov 2006, 19:20

and if they keep it going this way, they will loose audience, noone the less!

race_invader · Post by **race_invader** » 20 Nov 2006, 08:47

Im taking back my copy of NFS Carbon i cannot play it anymore its freezes when its at the menu and makes a huge loud squeeking sound from the TV also the disk is in such great condition so yeah im gonna take it back and get my money back

btw i have the game on xbox so i have no idea why its fudging up on me its also sad that that im taking it back but i cannot stand it anymore

Strafer · Post by **Strafer** » 21 Nov 2006, 00:08

Hmm... I was playing Carbon on my friends computer, and I started a new career, the changes between platforms are huge, on Xbox (1) the Neville guy just speaks, nothing more, but, on the pc you can see him in cutscenes, its like a whole new game

Dammit.

redarmy · Post by **redarmy** » 21 Nov 2006, 12:00

Well, he is the monkey

EVO_VIII · Post by **EVO_VIII** » 21 Nov 2006, 17:32

danyutz wrote:This is so wrong, how can they ask for fee, in trade for some upgrades? Not good at all ..

LOL In next NFS, we may need to buy parts (e.g. doors, mirrors, seats, gear box, wheel)to build up a car so we can race

BrontoX · Post by **BrontoX** » 21 Nov 2006, 17:48

That's a sign that they are getting bankcrupt

Andredew · Post by **Andredew** » 21 Nov 2006, 17:52

@Strafer: of course... xbox=old gen... pc=current gen

HIACE · Post by **HIACE** » 23 Nov 2006, 22:35

BrontoX wrote:EA is becoming lazy as time goes by they make tons of stupid games instead of making few great games.
I wish Ubisoft had the licence cuz they make great games

I'll second that. It's really lame EA is charging us for something we've already paid for. Also very angry i can't customize the '99 eclipse

BrontoX · Post by **BrontoX** » 23 Nov 2006, 23:09

They charge us cuz they don't have much money left cuz they make tons of games and don't sell enough so they are getting bankrupt.

Ceano · Post by **Ceano** » 24 Nov 2006, 00:19

BrontoX wrote:They charge us cuz they don't have much money left cuz they make tons of games and don't sell enough so they are getting bankrupt.

Well that's because they always screw there customers all the time

evilmegamonkey · Post by **evilmegamonkey** » 24 Nov 2006, 00:30

Andredew wrote:@Strafer: of course... xbox=old gen... pc=current gen

Correction: PC=Always Gen

Post by **TheStig** » 24 Nov 2006, 08:56

BrontoX wrote:They charge us cuz they don't have much money left cuz they make tons of games and don't sell enough so they are getting bankrupt.

think again mate, EA is FAR from bankrupt.

HIACE · Post by **HIACE** » 24 Nov 2006, 23:40

BrontoX wrote:They charge us cuz they don't have much money left cuz they make tons of games and don't sell enough so they are getting bankrupt.

Thats because they don't make any good games any more.

Skyline_man · Post by **Skyline_man** » 24 Nov 2006, 23:59

HIACE wrote:
BrontoX wrote:They charge us cuz they don't have much money left cuz they make tons of games and don't sell enough so they are getting bankrupt.
Thats because they don't make any good games any more.

I dont think so.

PSZeTa · Post by **PSZeTa** » 25 Nov 2006, 00:01

Their ideas are fairly good. However, the way they finish up the game is extremely bad, like when Carbon crashes and the shiznit AI. They sell the games like they're perfect, but they are far from that.

Strafer · Post by **Strafer** » 25 Nov 2006, 00:24

Is there any saves for the Xbox-version of Carbon?