Pro Street June Q&A answers back
Pro Street June Q&A answers back
Remember the Q&A session back in June when we offered our visitors to ask EA about damage, physics and smoke in Need for Speed Pro street? Well after little more than a month we finally got the answers back from EA's John Doyle, producer on NFSPS. Unfortunatly the team is pretty busy so unfortunatly the next Q&A will be organized in August.
Anyway head on to the article and find out how bumpers and hoods hang off the car and bounce around and how they worsen your top speed but it will still allow you to win the race. Or how the physics will allow you to race on hardcore mode (no assists) which will be *the* mode to break records in.
To find out more, read the full q&a.
Anyway head on to the article and find out how bumpers and hoods hang off the car and bounce around and how they worsen your top speed but it will still allow you to win the race. Or how the physics will allow you to race on hardcore mode (no assists) which will be *the* mode to break records in.
To find out more, read the full q&a.
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
Sounds fair to me!
The game at this moment look nice but, let's see when it will available, I don't want to pay for a game full of bugs again.
1 good thing = Driving on 2 wheels.
1 bad thing = No way to blow off the doors.
The game at this moment look nice but, let's see when it will available, I don't want to pay for a game full of bugs again.
1 good thing = Driving on 2 wheels.
1 bad thing = No way to blow off the doors.
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
a lot of the answers were "no, we don't want to be too punishing"
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
Ha ha, you noticed that too. And they completely avoided the question about the damage meter, not that we don't know the answer now...it's a no...Fishwhiz wrote:a lot of the answers were "no, we don't want to be too punishing"
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
I wouldn't want to sound too punishing, so I'll STFU.
A word to the wise is enough
A word to the wise is enough
Still rolling my eyes
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
I find itâ€s good that they donâ€t lie like the year ago..NFS ProStreet is not a simulator
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
When asked about the Damage meter they didn't even answer they took us around the question by saying something else, EA wake up we are not stupid.
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
This is a typo, he mean : NFS ProStreet is not a stimulator.taz947 wrote:I find itâ€s good that they donâ€t lie like the year ago..NFS ProStreet is not a simulator
Sorry, it was too easy.
- Porsche-AG
- Unbeatable
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 22 Jun 2006, 03:12
- Location: Canada
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
Gee, I didn't know grammar are like that.The physics is quite accurate and believable this year...
Another grammar problem has led me to believe that they are saying that they never think, and a side note would be that they liked changing tires. So people who don't think and like changing tires are the ones producing this game. Excellent.We didn't think, changing tires felt like tons of fun!
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
The physics is???
They are Americans and they canâ€t speak English??WTF?
They are Americans and they canâ€t speak English??WTF?
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
These guys are so stupid. They can't speak correctly and all they say is "We didn't want the game to be too punishing", and "changing tires is not fun". the truth is they're lazy. changing tires or buying gas or something would have made the game a lot more realistic. An it wouldn't have had anything to do with simulation or punishment. EA, just sell need for speed and let other guys who want to make something interesting out of it do the job
Caine pan' la moarte si dincolo de ea!
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
EA could let NFS series to Atari.They did a good job with TDU.
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
taz947 wrote:EA could let NFS series to Atari.They did a good job with TDU.
Not really.... Get real
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
He is real, have you even played it? I don't think so.Python_S wrote:taz947 wrote:EA could let NFS series to Atari.They did a good job with TDU.
Not really.... Get real
Atari has done a very good job with TDU it has brought us Ferraris, Saleens, Classic cars and everything a good Auto Simulation/arcade gamer wants.
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
BrontoX wrote:He is real, have you even played it? I don't think so.Python_S wrote:taz947 wrote:EA could let NFS series to Atari.They did a good job with TDU.
Not really.... Get real
Atari has done a very good job with TDU it has brought us Ferraris, Saleens, Classic cars and everything a good Auto Simulation/arcade gamer wants.
Of course i've played it.... I wouldn't have said anything if i didn't... One word BORING. NFS series screwed up as they are lately are still a lot more entertaining.
- Carcrazy
- Unbeatable
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: 28 May 2006, 05:08
- Location: /// .Happy in Exile. \\\
- Contact:
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
I do have to give him that... TDU is a great game, but I lost interest in 3 days.
- TheMasochisr
- Ricer
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 19 Jul 2007, 18:42
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
taz947 wrote:The physics is???
They are Americans and they canâ€t speak English??WTF?
you people could stop whining and b!tching about grammar or you could be glad we are getting a change in direction is the series. sometimes the idiocy of board members makes me want to slap them. hard. while wearing brass knuckles.red_dawg wrote:These guys are so stupid. They can't speak correctly and all they say is "We didn't want the game to be too punishing", and "changing tires is not fun". the truth is they're lazy. changing tires or buying gas or something would have made the game a lot more realistic. An it wouldn't have had anything to do with simulation or punishment. EA, just sell need for speed and let other guys who want to make something interesting out of it do the job
- Glopaticki
- Drift King
- Posts: 524
- Joined: 26 May 2007, 07:28
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
The poor grammer comes up when its translated from one langauge to another, it ain't perfect.
- TheMasochisr
- Ricer
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 19 Jul 2007, 18:42
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
Glopaticki wrote:The poor grammer comes up when its translated from one langauge to another, it ain't perfect.
- Glopaticki
- Drift King
- Posts: 524
- Joined: 26 May 2007, 07:28
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
I was talkin bout the grammer in the article...... let me fix itTheMasochisr wrote:Glopaticki wrote:The poor grammer comes up when its translated from one langauge to another, it ain't perfect.
The poor grammar in the article comes up when its translated from langauge to another, it aint perfect!!
Happy??
Last edited by Glopaticki on 28 Jul 2007, 12:42, edited 1 time in total.
- Andre_online
- Unbeatable
- Posts: 7730
- Joined: 04 Jun 2004, 10:43
- Location: Singapore (GMT+8)
- Contact:
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
Haha! You spelt the word 'grammar' wrong, and yet you still can talk about their grammatical error.. I think that's what TM meant.
- Glopaticki
- Drift King
- Posts: 524
- Joined: 26 May 2007, 07:28
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Pro Street June Q&A answers back
Whoops my bad....
But you get what i mean
But you get what i mean