Please post a pic...
Posted: 13 Apr 2005, 04:32
I seriously need a pic of Need for Speed Underground/ Underground 2 with a GeForce 3 Ti500
Page 1 of 2
Posted: 13 Apr 2005, 11:34
What must the pic contain???
Posted: 13 Apr 2005, 17:39
got a GF3 Ti200, is that near enough? & what sorrt of settings do you want etc?
Posted: 13 Apr 2005, 18:06
Here is an underground logo I'll have the Undeground 2 in just a sec
Posted: 13 Apr 2005, 20:33
@ViperGt: LOL 
He doesn't want the 2 logo's, he want ingame screenshots from both games with that graphix car
He doesn't want the 2 logo's, he want ingame screenshots from both games with that graphix car
Posted: 13 Apr 2005, 20:53
... A GeForce 3 Ti200 is close enough. Please post that pic. I'm planning to buy one and I will buy a new processor about 5 months later. I have to buy something under $60 bcause I have only $50, and my parents will just pay the extra $10 if needed...
Posted: 13 Apr 2005, 21:48
It seems you don't really know anything about computer hardware.
It's not worth it at all.
Do you just want it to look a little good? Sorry, but you are just wasting your money.
It's not worth it at all.
Do you just want it to look a little good? Sorry, but you are just wasting your money.Posted: 13 Apr 2005, 23:05
Then if you want to be rude what would you suggest to him?
Posted: 14 Apr 2005, 00:50
Hey, I don't want an opinion. All I want is a screenshot of NFSU or NFSU2 with that card.PSZeTa wrote:It seems you don't really know anything about computer hardware.
It's not worth it at all.
Posted: 14 Apr 2005, 08:05
Better make a screenshot of NFSU2 because NFSU1 doesn't need a good graphics card
Posted: 14 Apr 2005, 08:27
NFSU2 needs exactly the same graphics card as NFSU.
A GF4 4200ti is the minimum there to have all those special effects.
BTW buying a GF3, even for $50 is a waste of money. Rather get a new radeon 9200 for the same amount of money. It should outperform the gf3. Have in mind that a gf3 is a prehistoric gfx card.
A GF4 4200ti is the minimum there to have all those special effects.
BTW buying a GF3, even for $50 is a waste of money. Rather get a new radeon 9200 for the same amount of money. It should outperform the gf3. Have in mind that a gf3 is a prehistoric gfx card.
Posted: 14 Apr 2005, 12:03
Didn't know that i thought with the same card the graphics off nfsu2 might be worse then with nfsu1, but thanks for the info Bojan
Posted: 14 Apr 2005, 12:41
Game engine is the same 
NFSU2 demo did run a bit worse on my gf 4 4200, but the same effects were available (reflections, motion blur).
NFSU2 demo did run a bit worse on my gf 4 4200, but the same effects were available (reflections, motion blur).
Posted: 14 Apr 2005, 18:01
Let me put it this way, if I found a GeForce 4 laying around in a street, I wouldnt pick it up. But I would save my 50 odd quid for a year or maybe even put it in a bank
To be honest, when graphic cards go down to such a level, you know its life is over. Its only good for testing an AGP slot or playing solitare
I currently own a 9200 128mb and while I can live with lowest gfx setting, I cannot live with wasted money as I only upgrade a couple of years or so....
To be honest, when graphic cards go down to such a level, you know its life is over. Its only good for testing an AGP slot or playing solitare
I currently own a 9200 128mb and while I can live with lowest gfx setting, I cannot live with wasted money as I only upgrade a couple of years or so....
Posted: 14 Apr 2005, 21:48
Well, I tried, but I've not got a working mobo with an AGP slot the card fits in anymoreStereo wrote:... A GeForce 3 Ti200 is close enough. Please post that pic. I'm planning to buy one and I will buy a new processor about 5 months later. I have to buy something under $60 bcause I have only $50, and my parents will just pay the extra $10 if needed...
Posted: 15 Apr 2005, 00:56
OK, then I might buy a Radeon 9500.
Posted: 15 Apr 2005, 02:46
i have a geforce 5200 and the graphics are pretty good for only 80 $ canadian
Posted: 16 Apr 2005, 21:18
For $50 I have a GF4 card I'll sell you, it's not going to run the game with everything turned up, but it will run it fine, I just replaced it with a GF6600 GT-AGP card. FWIW, you can get a mobo with built in graphics for about $90 so save your money cause it will be at least GF4 quality. Otherwise may I suggest holding on to it and saving your money to get a newer card. Like someone said, put it in the bank and let it grow interest for a few months, while saving some more.
Posted: 21 Apr 2005, 11:26
You must be kidding, Integrated Graphics are rubbish.
Posted: 21 Apr 2005, 13:20
I received the FX 5200 and it's like a dream! everything is able to be on! XFX RULEZ!
Posted: 21 Apr 2005, 16:12
huh? 5200 is a dream?Stereo wrote:I received the FX 5200 and it's like a dream! everything is able to be on! XFX RULEZ!
5700 and 5900 are the minimum for a good 1024x768 experience !
Posted: 21 Apr 2005, 21:08
WELL, for me it's like a dream! I was stuck with a dumb GeForce2 GTS 32MB for 6 years! I wanted a new video card! 2 year's I've waited, now it's finally here! I don't care what you guys say...
Posted: 21 Apr 2005, 23:25
LOL, I just changed my FX 5200 for a Radeon 9600pro advantage, now tháts like a dream
Posted: 22 Apr 2005, 00:36
hey, how about you had a GeForce 2 GTS 32MB, and you had to wait two years just to get a FX5200 because you only got $50 from working. I had to do that and for me, the FX5200 is a dream come tru. Also, if I work up more money, I will get a new CPU processor around 1.5-2.0 GHz.
Posted: 22 Apr 2005, 11:22
lol stereo. i once had a geforce mx420 and then i got a fx5700le and i was like. WOW this card is amarzing. but after a while youre just like. damn this card sucks. for 20 more bucks i couldve gotten something twice the power of what i got. but at least youre happy for the time being