And I don't feel like choosing, so can I have both? They both have there pros and cons IMO.
RX-7 or RX-8???
- TheNoobofFerraris
- Professional

- Posts: 1070
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 18:31
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
-
James31278
- Banned
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: 10 Apr 2005, 22:34
- TheNoobofFerraris
- Professional

- Posts: 1070
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 18:31
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
-
James31278
- Banned
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: 10 Apr 2005, 22:34
- TheNoobofFerraris
- Professional

- Posts: 1070
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 18:31
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
Yeah I guess I wasn't aware of what you said, oh well over and done with.James31278 wrote:Are you high? I said I used to think the Oil consumption was a bad thing until I read it uses one quart of oil every 10,000 miles.TheNoobofFerraris wrote:Dude seriously it seems like every post you make is negative.
- Andre_online
- Unbeatable

- Posts: 7728
- Joined: 04 Jun 2004, 10:43
- Location: Singapore (GMT+8)
- Contact:
Wrote my posts 1 or 2 pages back while I am in discussion with Grezs supra!Hecubus wrote:Well, we can't really prove you wrong until you offer something other than the basic opinion that you prefer the RX-8. Indeed, it's better than the RX-7 in some aspects, although for pure preformance, the RX-7 easily wins.
User deactivated: Habitual rule breaking; Abject lack of respect for the community.
- boganbusman
- Unbeatable

- Posts: 5140
- Joined: 03 Sep 2004, 12:09
- Location: Mute City
- Contact:
I think it's time to wrap this up.
The RX-7 was built as a sports car, as was the trend during the time it was built. It's meant for driving fast, nothing more.
The RX-8 is built as an everday practical performance car, so of course it is not as fast as the RX-7 sports car, but it's more practical and easier to live with.
The one you like more will depend on what you like in a car. Pure performance or practical performance.
The RX-7 was built as a sports car, as was the trend during the time it was built. It's meant for driving fast, nothing more.
The RX-8 is built as an everday practical performance car, so of course it is not as fast as the RX-7 sports car, but it's more practical and easier to live with.
The one you like more will depend on what you like in a car. Pure performance or practical performance.
Sorry kids, on the RX7club the RX-8 guys have allready given in to the RX-7boganbusman wrote:I think it's time to wrap this up.
The RX-7 was built as a sports car, as was the trend during the time it was built. It's meant for driving fast, nothing more.
The RX-8 is built as an everday practical performance car, so of course it is not as fast as the RX-7 sports car, but it's more practical and easier to live with.
The one you like more will depend on what you like in a car. Pure performance or practical performance.
It happened a long time ago and without too much of a fight too.
The RX-7 was designed as a track weapon, a quick look at the suspension setup and parts used will reveal that.
Especially the rear bushings they used, they are known to be effective on the track, but with a very limited life span.
The RX-8 is nothing more than a rotary powered family car with fancy 2 door looks.
And after what I have heard, the tuning is very limited for the 8, due to ECU problems and such (According to RX-8 owners)
Most people that are looking for a sports car that can go fast they go for the RX-7 FD, but if you are looking for a more of a daily driver the 8 is your thing.
So sorry guys, the discussion was ended a long time ago, between the 8 and 7 owners themselves
-
James31278
- Banned
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: 10 Apr 2005, 22:34
-
James31278
- Banned
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: 10 Apr 2005, 22:34
Didn't you two basically say the exact same thing?Sweeper wrote:Sorry kids, on the RX7club the RX-8 guys have allready given in to the RX-7boganbusman wrote:I think it's time to wrap this up.
The RX-7 was built as a sports car, as was the trend during the time it was built. It's meant for driving fast, nothing more.
The RX-8 is built as an everday practical performance car, so of course it is not as fast as the RX-7 sports car, but it's more practical and easier to live with.
The one you like more will depend on what you like in a car. Pure performance or practical performance.
It happened a long time ago and without too much of a fight too.
The RX-7 was designed as a track weapon, a quick look at the suspension setup and parts used will reveal that.
Especially the rear bushings they used, they are known to be effective on the track, but with a very limited life span.
The RX-8 is nothing more than a rotary powered family car with fancy 2 door looks.
And after what I have heard, the tuning is very limited for the 8, due to ECU problems and such (According to RX-8 owners)
Most people that are looking for a sports car that can go fast they go for the RX-7 FD, but if you are looking for a more of a daily driver the 8 is your thing.
So sorry guys, the discussion was ended a long time ago, between the 8 and 7 owners themselves
- boganbusman
- Unbeatable

- Posts: 5140
- Joined: 03 Sep 2004, 12:09
- Location: Mute City
- Contact:
-
James31278
- Banned
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: 10 Apr 2005, 22:34
- Grez~Supra_RZ-S
- Valued Member

- Posts: 3092
- Joined: 02 Dec 2003, 21:46
- Location: Hair Salon
-
James31278
- Banned
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: 10 Apr 2005, 22:34
Actually no its not an X it's this......A curved V with a line in it.Grez~Supra_RZ-S wrote:Its actually an 'X'.
I used to have it on an RX7 owners club hat that I bought when my brother had one. 'Efini' just means JDM, as Eunos does for the MX5. What you realy want is an RZ, or better yet, a Spirit-R.

- Grez~Supra_RZ-S
- Valued Member

- Posts: 3092
- Joined: 02 Dec 2003, 21:46
- Location: Hair Salon
- steelsnake00
- Professional

- Posts: 2136
- Joined: 28 Aug 2005, 17:54
- Location: Cirencester, UK




