The New/Prototype/Concept Car Topic

RVD · Post by **RVD** » 17 Oct 2006, 16:34

the thing weighs a few tons man!!!

compare it to the stock Hummer

steelsnake00 · Post by **steelsnake00** » 17 Oct 2006, 16:40

What a pile of $hite.

xHaZxMaTx · Post by **xHaZxMaTx** » 17 Oct 2006, 22:43

2007 Ford Mustang GT/CS (California Special)

jacoja06 · Post by **jacoja06** » 17 Oct 2006, 23:58

Those Spykers are certainly not the best looking car around (I get the impression that it was designed by an 8-year-old during lunch-break hour).

Love the Mustang GT/CS however... but you cant beat a new Shelby Mustang looks-wise

darknight788 · Post by **darknight788** » 18 Oct 2006, 17:14

do those california specila mustangs get the same upgrades as the hertz mustangs or are they stock

RVD · Post by **RVD** » 18 Oct 2006, 17:26

jacoja06 wrote:Those Spykers are certainly not the best looking car around (I get the impression that it was designed by an 8-year-old during lunch-break hour).

you just said that because its Dutch.....

That mustang looks cool

xHaZxMaTx · Post by **xHaZxMaTx** » 18 Oct 2006, 20:14

darknight788 wrote:do those california specila mustangs get the same upgrades as the hertz mustangs or are they stock

Why don't you read the article?

steelsnake00 · Post by **steelsnake00** » 18 Oct 2006, 20:39

Ouch, 3 valves in a 4.6l v8, thats less than one per two cylinders!

;););)

darknight788 · Post by **darknight788** » 19 Oct 2006, 04:03

@ xHaZxMaTx bah ! i dont have time to read articles on a stang
@ steelsnake00 you really gotta feel bad for the 4 and 5 valve V8's

jacoja06 · Post by **jacoja06** » 19 Oct 2006, 08:26

RVD wrote:you just said that because its Dutch.....

Did I now?
I actually said that because I think it's an unattractive carâ€¦ but whatever you say.

bashderq · Post by **bashderq** » 19 Oct 2006, 12:02

Usually DAMD make very nice kits (the DAMD evo from 2F2F is an example) but this time they were just trying too hard.

Tyrant · Post by **Tyrant** » 19 Oct 2006, 12:05

Lol, an Aston Martin grill

. The wheels are ugly.

Kid Cro · Post by **Kid Cro** » 22 Oct 2006, 22:18

Police starts to get criminal for serious!

xHaZxMaTx · Post by **xHaZxMaTx** » 22 Oct 2006, 22:20

I guess Dodge released a police spec Charger. That thing must haul some serious ass.

Hecubus · Post by **Hecubus** » 23 Oct 2006, 00:42

It came out almost a year ago (along with a police-spec Magnum). The V6 model (which most will be) is as quick as the V8-powered Crown Victoria, and the V8 Charger is a suitable replacement for the old B4C Camaros (except it's got a useable back seat).

darknight788 · Post by **darknight788** » 23 Oct 2006, 03:22

yea i've seen a couple of them around here, all i can say is that if you plan on out running them you better have a car that can do 170 + mph, also remember that they have more friends than you when your trying to outrun them

Hecubus · Post by **Hecubus** » 23 Oct 2006, 20:31

Just remember, you can't outrun radio waves.

Kid Cro · Post by **Kid Cro** » 23 Oct 2006, 21:16

xHaZxMaTx wrote:I guess Dodge released a police spec Charger. That thing must haul some serious bumbum.

Dodge will release 3 new cars next year, I know coz where I work we sell Dodge, Chrysler & Jeep. Dodge Nitro will rock!!!!!!
But Avanger

Damn that car will be shock to all but I can say that it rocks!

Hecubus · Post by **Hecubus** » 24 Oct 2006, 02:53

The Nitro is mediocre, it's basically a rebadged Jeep Liberty. The Avenger's Dodge's version of the Sebring, isn't it? I can't think of what else Dodge has planned, except the Caliber SRT-4 (which is almost cool, in a DCX must employ a bunch of nutjobs kinda way).

Kid Cro · Post by **Kid Cro** » 24 Oct 2006, 17:49

http://www.tportal.hr/fset.html
Dunno if it was posteb but here it is BMW 3 Cabrio!

Avanger is Dodge's sebring?? No way!

Ohhh gosh there is one car that Jeep will release next year but I can't remember the name! It looks same as Caliber but cooler!

I drived Caliber and it's totaly uncontrolable it understeer or oversteer whatever and loses traction every time when you accelerate to max. ( When you push pedal to the metal) 2.0 is BMW's engine but I still BMW and Dodge are diferent cars and have diferent conceptions! So point is that BMW with 2.0 engine will preform better than caliber with 2.0 engine!
I don't know if Caliber will be SRT but I hope it will!
Also drived Grand Cherokee SRT and I was like WTF!!! I tought that he's like a rock!
But I was wrong, the car is soooo fast that my hart started to dump faster!
450HP I think and 6.1 Engine with 400 Nm (Not sure, don't catch me for word)

steelsnake00 · Post by **steelsnake00** » 24 Oct 2006, 19:13

What on firetruck earth did that mean?

Kid Cro · Post by **Kid Cro** » 24 Oct 2006, 19:34

I was comparing Caliber and BMW coz caliber uses BMW's 2.0 Engine!

xHaZxMaTx · Post by **xHaZxMaTx** » 24 Oct 2006, 20:41

So you're saying that a BMW will perform better than a Dodge just because it's a BMW?

baadmw · Post by **baadmw** » 24 Oct 2006, 21:11

he says that the bmw handels better and thats why it preforms better... what beemer are we talking about ayway?

Hecubus · Post by **Hecubus** » 25 Oct 2006, 00:21

http://www.dodge.com/en/avenger/gallery/index.html

You mean that Avenger, right? I'm certain that's based on the same platform as the new Sebring. As for the Caliber, there'll be an SRT-4 version in a few months, with 300hp (and FWD only, torque steer heaven, I imagine).

The Jeep you're talking about could be either the Compass or the Patriot. They're both a waste of time. At least the GC SRT-8 has a good reason for being useless offroad. BTW, it's actually 425hp, but it's still very fast for a 5000lbs vehicle (it's Chrysler's quickest vehicle to use the 6.1 Hemi, since it launches better with AWD).