How good or crappy is your setup?

weedman173 · Post by **weedman173** » 30 Sep 2006, 16:04

Well I think we have established that this is not the most accurate scan, you got a higher ranking than me even though all my parts are much better than yours.

t3ice · Post by **t3ice** » 30 Sep 2006, 19:44

Man this scanner is soo messed up o_0

darknight788 · Post by **darknight788** » 30 Sep 2006, 21:27

i dont even worry about it it says i dont even have a sound card which i do ( santa Cruz 5.1) i think it is partially or mostly retarded

Ragotech · Post by **Ragotech** » 12 Nov 2006, 08:21

finally i have seen the rate.and it is good.

t3ice · Post by **t3ice** » 12 Nov 2006, 13:35

Hey nic score dude..
hmm i wonder what would happen if i tested my gaming rig???!

DeMyX · Post by **DeMyX** » 12 Nov 2006, 13:37

t3ice wrote:Hey nic score dude..
hmm i wonder what would happen if i tested my gaming rig???!

You would probarly get your own special testing thing, cus your comp so good. <3 hails t3ice comp.

t3ice · Post by **t3ice** » 12 Nov 2006, 14:01

Are u try to firetruck with me here?...cuz if u are lemme tell u..flaming is strictly forbidden here....if u have a problem...take it out on msn or something.

DeMyX · Post by **DeMyX** » 12 Nov 2006, 15:23

t3ice wrote:Are u try to firetruck with me here?...cuz if u are lemme tell u..flaming is strictly forbidden here....if u have a problem...take it out on msn or something.

Nah, I just have so crap specs and i'm jealous at everyone.

PSZeTa · Post by **PSZeTa** » 12 Nov 2006, 15:32

t3ice wrote:Hey nic score dude..
hmm i wonder what would happen if i tested my gaming rig???!

Try it I guess.

And we can now officially say that this test is bogus:

Old rig:
http://i15.tinypic.com/2wr3xwx.jpg

Upgraded:
http://i15.tinypic.com/47s2otl.jpg

How can Ragotech's PC have a better score than mine?

Skyline_man · Post by **Skyline_man** » 12 Nov 2006, 16:14

PSZeTa wrote:
t3ice wrote:Hey nic score dude..
hmm i wonder what would happen if i tested my gaming rig???!
Try it I guess.

And we can now officially say that this test is bogus:

Old rig:
http://i15.tinypic.com/2wr3xwx.jpg

Upgraded:
http://i15.tinypic.com/47s2otl.jpg

How can Ragotech's PC have a better score than mine?

Its not accurate PSZeTa, i saw someone before with even better specs than you and he had less rating than Ragotech's setup too, i even have a better processor and 2 GB of RAM, and i almost have the same results's as Ragotech's.

PSZeTa · Post by **PSZeTa** » 12 Nov 2006, 16:38

Problem is that AMD X2s completely DESTROY Pentium Ds on similar speeds.

Crappy. :3

Skyline_man · Post by **Skyline_man** » 12 Nov 2006, 16:59

yeah, it seems like that test is Pentium D friendly.

korge · Post by **korge** » 12 Nov 2006, 17:18

Just a curious thought, what is the speed on your memory?

Are they twin gig sticks?

PSZeTa · Post by **PSZeTa** » 12 Nov 2006, 17:41

Twin GB, OCZ Platinum XTC PC4000.

Blaindless · Post by **Blaindless** » 12 Nov 2006, 18:46

I get new computer at christmas but this is my poc. now

t3ice · Post by **t3ice** » 13 Nov 2006, 12:52

@ DeMyx : err..umm sorry about that....i was in a bad mood yesterday ..
Im all back to normal now :mrgreeen:

Maybe the scanner shows the results based on different classes...eg Ragotech's setup may have been put under the mid range pc's..and it topped there...but PSZeta's pc must have been put in a higher catagory..and thats where his pc stood in that range.

either way i stll think its based on some criteria set by some n00bs at hardware

SP4RCO · Post by **SP4RCO** » 25 Nov 2006, 20:41

There should be a tool like this which allowed you to select your desired specs and then check their performance...

I want to upgrade

BrontoX · Post by **BrontoX** » 25 Nov 2006, 21:31

I don't belive it!!! I thought my specs are rubish.

darknight788 · Post by **darknight788** » 25 Nov 2006, 22:43

it is your processor 3.0 ghz is pretty fast, my specs are better except for my processor which is 2.0 ghz so my processor is probably a bottleneck whereas yours isnt as much.
BTW--- you should upgrade to 1gb memory and then that system will play alot of games pretty well. just an idea

BrontoX · Post by **BrontoX** » 25 Nov 2006, 22:51

I have an AGP motherboard so it isn't worth it. Also i have 2 Kingstons 2x256 in pair dual channel so it's actually at a speed of 1 gb of ram.
I plan on getting Quad core and DX 10 GFX card.

PSZeTa · Post by **PSZeTa** » 25 Nov 2006, 23:39

BrontoX wrote:I have an AGP motherboard so it isn't worth it. Also i have 2 Kingstons 2x256 in pair dual channel so it's actually at a speed of 1 gb of ram.
I plan on getting Quad core and DX 10 GFX card.

Depending on what memory you are getting, you could be able to use it on your next PC. (DDR2) Also, having 2x256MB in dual channel is nowhere near 1GB.

BrontoX · Post by **BrontoX** » 25 Nov 2006, 23:45

I have DDR1.
And i tried disableing dual channel and i had 2x less performance then when i had it activated, so without it i had half the performance so in dual channel i get the performance of 2x256 DDR2 533 or more so basicly i have 784mb DDR1 Ram when i have the dual channel on.

underoath285 · Post by **underoath285** » 26 Nov 2006, 23:48

here is mine, not bad for a 3 year old dell...

darknight788 · Post by **darknight788** » 26 Nov 2006, 23:50

yea mine is a little bit higher just b/c i have 1 gb ram but then other than the gfx card i think our systems are the same. is your HDD 40 GB ?

underoath285 · Post by **underoath285** » 26 Nov 2006, 23:53

sadly;
lol it fills up quick