Rate the signature above you!

[RobinZ]

Creativity-7
Appearance-9
Overall-8

Nice, shot. nice blurr with the car and nice colrs in the background



(made mine with paint lol. just installed Photoshop)

[Carcrazy]

Creativity-3
Appearance-3
-

Overall-3

It's not bad for paint, but.... it's paint.

@next person: Rate my R3act sig please? Thx...

[ahmad0410]

Creativity: 6.5 (Shape is common to all react sigs)
Appearance: 7.5 (You need to adjust some protruding horizontal lines on the bottom and top of the sig.)

[Danyutz]

Creativity: 4 -
Appearance: 8 - i like the dark tones, the glare and the car, the name matches the sig theme
Difficulty: 6 - not so difficult for you

overall: 6

[Jopuma]

Ok now I have a question. How is it suddenly everybody isn't rating things anymore?

We used to use

Creativity
Appearance
Difficulty

Overall

Now we skip the Difficulty and Overall.

[xHaZxMaTx]

Someone suggested we not rate difficulty because it's a relative thing.

[Jopuma]

We can still at least put the Overall in there. And we can actually just replace the difficulty rating with a Detail rating or something where we rate how detailed it is.

[BrontoX]

We can still at least put the Overall in there. And we can actually just replace the difficulty rating with a Detail rating or something where we rate how detailed it is.

Good idea.

[Porsche-AG]

Why don't we do something rather than chat, then? I'll start it up again with a "Prototype" rating system @ danyutz:

Creativity: 5 (Overused React theme)
Appearance: 8 (Looks good)
Detail: 7 (Seems quite detailed)
Size: 9 (Nice size)
Opacity: 7 (Some transparent sections)
Transparency: 3 (Mostly Opaque)
Colors: 4 (Black, white, red, cyan)
Text: 3 (Simple reACT text used)
Mathematically Appealing Angles: 5 (Simple half-parabolic angle used)
Use of Shapes: 8 (Circles and angles nicely blended)

Overall: 5.9
Combined Total: 59

[Carcrazy]

I think We should just stick with the old way... since people who spend alot of time on their sigs should get the credit for it.

[BrontoX]

Carcrazy:

Creativity: 3 (Car sigs aren't creative but the background makes up for it)
Appearance: 7.5 (It does look good)
Detail: 7 (Detail is good)

Overall: 5.83

[Danyutz]

I'll start it up again with a "Prototype" rating system @ danyutz

umm kinda complicated, i'll stick to the old one

@Carcrazy

Creativity: 6
Appearance: 8 - i like the colors, the car fits the background
Detail: 7 - enough details to show a cool signature, great job with the glare

Overall: 7

[Jopuma]

^^ Dude you're supposed to rate BrontoX. ^^

It's "Rate the Signature ABOVE you" not "Rate the person who rated you."

[Danyutz]

^^ Dude you're supposed to rate BrontoX. ^^

It's "Rate the Signature ABOVE you" not "Rate the person who rated you."

oh really? I already rated his sig some posts behind Jo, that's why I rated Carcrazy's

I'm really not that stupid you know?

[xHaZxMaTx]

If you've already rated his signature, and it's 'Rate the Sig Above You', why did you post?

[BrontoX]

If you've already rated his signature, and it's 'Rate the Sig Above You', why did you post?

He has a point there.

[Danyutz]

If you've already rated his signature, and it's 'Rate the Sig Above You', why did you post?

sorry, but it's really that bad that I made a mistake and added another post in the topic?

[BrontoX]

What do you mean?

If i understand correctly you want to ask if it's possible to post more than 3 times and the answer is yes but if you go overboard then no. Basicly the 3 posts limit per page is for the ratings.

[Dragster]

If you've already rated his signature, and it's 'Rate the Sig Above You', why did you post?

sorry, but it's really that bad that I made a mistake and added another post in the topic?

No one said it's bad, he just outsmartassed you, big time

[Danyutz]

i saw that, and it's rude ... no more offtopic

[Carcrazy]

Yeah, we should get ontopic..... so I'll rate his, (since he was the last to rate).

Creativity: 7
Appearance: 5 - I like the design of the background.... I can't really come up with some simpler things like that...
Detail: 6 - There's plenty of subtile details to keep you looking at it for awhile.

and I've spotted some fractal brushes or c4d's in the left hand side of the sig.

You have a very good eye don't you?

Thx, BTW.

[xHaZxMaTx]

i saw that, and it's rude...

Well excuse me for pointing out your mistakes. Hopefully you don't make them twice.

[Jopuma]

Ok time for me to rate Carcrazy's Ichigo sig.

Creativity: 7-Fantastic (Not that high because Bleach has been used alot {by me } but still quite good with the way it was made)
Appearance: 9-Outrageous (The well placed renders and brushes make this sig a joy to look at. The highly attractive focals are very pleasing to the eye)
Detail: 8-Superb (Amazing use and placement of spatter brushes and I've spotted some fractal brushes or c4d's in the left hand side of the sig. Very highly detailed and constructed extremely well)

Overall: 8-Superb (Job well done!)

[xHaZxMaTx]

Creativity - 8 :: Don't see many signatures being made for web browsers and I can honestly say I've never seen anyone incorporate so much .PNG transparency into a sig.
Aesthetics - 9 :: I really like the transparency, and the vibrant, high-contrast (and complimentary) colour scheme looks very nice against the grey background of the forum. I also like how the orange designs on the bottom fade to white, like a fox tail.
Difficulty - 2 :: I'm assuming you didn't make the Firefox logo, yourself, and the little designs underneath don't look terribly hard to make.

Overall - 6.33~ :: Very nice, visually pleasing and certainly unique - good job.

[snoopdogg879]

creativity- 7 i like all the brush looking things and the tiger or whatever it is
appearance- 8 the color is really nice because every thing flows in the sig
difficulty- 9 cuz i dont know how to make sigs look that good yet

overall- 8 very good work on the sig