KammyworldRacerGT4 wrote:OH, you mean sex, right?
![Eh? :-s](./images/smilies/eusa_eh.gif)
You buy a Maybach to be driven in. Bentley and Rolls-Royce are meant for you to drive, and to be driven in (the 4-door models).xHaZxMaTx wrote:What's all this nonsense about Rolls and Bentleys? You don't buy either to drive - you buy them to be driven in.
I don't like it. It's too much, I think - more to the rich-ageing demographics. I don't like the Azure and the Arnage either. I don't know about you, but I never approve the designs of these two cars. I don't mind being ridden in either one (who wouldn't?!), but I'd never buy them over the Continental series.Koenigsegg_Rox wrote:@ Andre: What about the Bentley Brooklands?
Whatever...xHaZxMaTx wrote:KammyworldRacerGT4 wrote:OH, you mean sex, right?
Good. Keep it to yourself and don't bother anyone else with it, because I for one don't want to hear the oppinions of whoever updated Wikipedia last.Sharpenor wrote:Hi guys, I left the website for long time but that came up with a advantage
I made researches about cars (Exotic, Muscle, Tuner, Concepts, sports and formula) that is not mentioned in alot of websites, Now you see...
Allways!Toshiro wrote:No MazdaSpeed MX-5?
Come to Australia! We have the 200SX. It pwns the 240SX.240sxlover wrote:
1st.Nisan 240SX '1992
It's not exactly as appealing as an Aston though.. In which currency?topsy kret1 wrote:AWD, tiwn-turbo v6 for 79,090. enough said.
The transmission is fine. Nailing it in launch control with semi slicks puts a tremendous amount of stress on the drivetrain.Koenigsegg_Rox wrote:Not to mention the fact that yes the R35 is a cheap supercar but it's not reeeaaaalllly that brilliant. That and the transmission is a doozy to pay for. The price to pay for turning on launch control? Approximately 20 grand. And that is in USD as well. One guy imported one here to Australia for our Targa Tasmania road rally, and it didn't do as well as expected. I believe it was something along the lines of 36th overall when it was actually one of the most technically advanced and most powerful cars in the rally.
I haven't read much about GT-Rs throwing their cogs around under hard use, unless it was ''abused'' using launch control. As far as I know, the 911 Turbo's launch off the line isn't nearly as aggressive as the GTR's.steelsnake00 wrote:I don't know any other car that eats transmissions at the rate the R35 is claimed to do under hard use. The 911 Turbo has just as much power and they don't throw their cogs everywhere if you give them some beans.
Even if the event isn't characterised by lack of skill, the GTR shouldn't be that much off pace.steelsnake00 wrote:The Targa Tasmania is frequented by some of the best professional and non-professional racing drivers in the world. It's not an event characterised by "lack of skill". The GTR was miles off the pace of 911 Turbos and even far less powerful GT3s throughout the race. In fact, it was beaten by a 1995 BMW M3.
in the rather low, quite useless, uncomparable u.s. dollar. i wish i was on the eruo (i apologize for spelling).Andre_online wrote:It's not exactly as appealing as an Aston though.. In which currency?topsy kret1 wrote:AWD, tiwn-turbo v6 for 79,090. enough said.