agree Holden and Ford sell crap to everyone, but that doesn't give us a right to go bashing them for no reason. If you are gonna bash them at least say why!
I don't like either company due to their lets sell s**t to everybody and make loadsa money attitudes. Plus their arrogant monopoly games.
yes, and your reason why is? if your going to accuse people of said reason, adhere to your own statement please....
And i beleive Toyota own the monopoly on the Australian car market. (Due mainly To their the domestically produced Landcruiser, Hilux and Camry/Avalon)
torque envy i beleive. Cylinders and Litres are the only Way of getting TRUE TORQUE the use of a turbo does not give True Torque, as it is only Available, in most cases within a certain rpm range (usually higher rpms) where its existence is of no use in everyday driving.
I like commodores (Standard) because
-Quality motors (202 with over 600 000 k's neone?, and the Buick V6 is eqaully tough, Series one VS V6's excluded)
-Generally Good Buid Qaulity (VN Excluded)
- Decent Power and Decent Torque From Stock Engines
-still suprisingly efficient
Dislike Falcons (Standard)
- Poor Build Quality (Plasticy flimsy feel of interior - AU good example)
There isnt much wrong with a falcon really, i just prefer holden, the Above does not take much too fix, and mechanical build quality is often better than holden
I dislike 'Riceburners' because of their NEED for forced induction to achieve any serious numbers on the dyno and down the strip.
Ever see any Seriosly tricked out imports that dont feature at least one turbo?
Although many muscle cars do have superchargers they are not required to achieve impressive figures.
While i dont have an issue with forced induction, i do beleive that if its not needed, dont use it. And i often use TTLS1 as an example of the superiority of the LS1, i use it mainly to show the quality of it, as opposed to 'wickedy turbo monaro WOW !!!!'
-delsonist