Page 1 of 5
Any Photographer's here?
Posted: 07 Dec 2004, 21:48
by 2gTSiAWD
I am wondering if there is any other members here that love and do photography as much as I do. If so:
What kind of camara do you use?
What do you normally take pictures of?
And show some work you have captured.
Once my image host get's back up I will post some nice pictures I have of my car and some other misc pictures I have taken.
Posted: 13 Jan 2005, 22:43
by ^StephaNOS^
Posted: 13 Jan 2005, 23:54
by Stereo
I'm in the middle of photography. I like it and sometimes don't do it...
Anyways:
Camera: Samsung Digimax 210 (2MPX, got on my 10th birthday)
I normally take pics of nature, parks, people, and rarely cars, because NH doesn't have lots of tuners... Even though I like takin pics of flowers alot, doesn't mean I'm a girly-type boy...
Here's some work...
My cat sleeping...
Front yard...
Backyard
water got on my lens...
no comment...
A bit blurry, forgot to turn off effect...
A lovely day at Boston...
tower in boston...
Flowers again...
That was less than half my pics tooken. All of my pics are on
http://teleganov.net/photoalbum-evgeny/ ... m=./EVGENY
Posted: 08 Feb 2005, 21:08
by 2gTSiAWD
Stereo those are some good pictures. You have a good eye.
One thing I would try next is to encorporate different objects into your pictures. Make them have some feeling. Or somehow make it tell a story.
Just a little pointer. Keep up the good work.
Posted: 08 Feb 2005, 21:33
by Hybrid 87
WRONG!!!!!
http://www.life-in-riga.net.tc
A little hobby of mine.
Posted: 09 Feb 2005, 01:42
by GT3x24x7
Photography is a passion for me too. I have a number of cameras, but the latest os a Canon EOS 20D DSLR.
Link
Here's a few samples. There's a bunch more at
http://timtam.deviantart.com 
Posted: 09 Feb 2005, 06:17
by Andre_online
Those pics look just like stock images! Nice work GT!
And Stereo, I love that building shot, I think it was great!
Posted: 09 Feb 2005, 16:40
by jemc
wow, the last one looks just awesome, GT. i love to take pictures but i have a very crappy camera. not even digital one
Posted: 10 Feb 2005, 12:22
by $DER PATE$
woooow some really nice pics
i luv the wafe & the tower
Posted: 10 Feb 2005, 15:39
by GT3x24x7
Thanks fellas!
Posted: 11 Feb 2005, 05:06
by Stereo
Posted: 12 Feb 2005, 00:08
by jemc
Posted: 05 Mar 2005, 02:45
by chimpzrl
Here are a few pics from a recent snow (Monday). The "forest" pics came from a creek near my house (across the street). They just started taking many trees down to make way for a "Nature Trail" (irony?). The ice pics came from some bushes in front of my house a few days later.
I use a crappy Concord Eye-Q Duo 2000 2 Megapixel $75 digital camera.
Pics are different sizes due to attachment size restriction.
Posted: 10 Mar 2005, 03:27
by Stereo
See all my best work at stereogtx.deviantart.com (the link thats in my sig also)
Posted: 10 Mar 2005, 17:08
by ^Sparco^
@Stereo's pic:
(This one)
WTF... it looks like a 2D tower
Odd optical illusion.
Posted: 10 Mar 2005, 22:03
by Stereo
Yeah, It's actually 4-sided! Hard to tell, huh?
Posted: 11 Mar 2005, 02:20
by wowirace
i am a photographer!! i photograph pics of my family and stuff..well, when they trust me enough to use their $500 camera...lol.
Posted: 11 Mar 2005, 17:11
by ^Sparco^
I have the Kodak CX4230 (yes, a bit crappy, but costed 200€
)
I am in love with this one:
KodaK EasyShare one. It costs 599$
Specs
Man I want it! It looks very good for a digi camera!
Posted: 11 Mar 2005, 18:30
by Andre_online
Digital SLR cameras are the best when they come to take pictures like this. They have a 9.0 mega pixel quality.
Posted: 11 Mar 2005, 20:39
by ^Sparco^
I dont care too much about MPx... there are more important things.
It is like the amount of memory in graphic cards... a 256Mb card is NOT twice as good as a 128Mb one. In fact, some 128Mb versions are better
2Mpx should be enough... that is 1600x1200 resolution, and you can print it in paper at 20cmx15cm (8inchx6inch).
Ppl say "wow" @ 9Mpx-cameras, but they could be a crap in other aspects...
Posted: 11 Mar 2005, 21:06
by Sir Ibi
altho 9 mega pixel quality is huge, and you would be able to incredible amounts of details, but the more mega pixels, the more memory you're gonna need. I have a 5 mega pixel camera which is good enuf for me, put perhaps for normal camera use 3 megapixel is probably the optimum size in terms of size and memory space required.
Posted: 15 Mar 2005, 20:22
by jemc
Posted: 24 Mar 2005, 04:41
by Stereo
Some kid thought that his 1MPX camera was better than my 2.1MPX because mine is just plastic, his is metal.
What an idiot!
Posted: 09 Apr 2005, 16:53
by jemc
Posted: 27 Apr 2005, 21:01
by jemc
)
