What cars do you want to drive in NFS:MW the most...??

Peter Ferrell · Post by **Peter Ferrell** » 07 Nov 2005, 23:37

Whoa... In my opinion, that should shoot down any doubts about the BMW not being an exotic... 0-60 in 4.8? THat's almost in the league of the Corvette. Almost.

Kid Cro · Post by **Kid Cro** » 08 Nov 2005, 11:28

Well who said that he is exotic. And one question for you peter. Is it corvette exotic?
And James you were right. Sorry.

James31278 · Post by **James31278** » 08 Nov 2005, 12:44

Kid Cro wrote:Well who said that he is exotic. And one question for you peter. Is it corvette exotic?
And James you were right. Sorry.

It's cool dude

and yes the Corvette is an exotic, shes now 505hp looking viperish mean and ready to kick ass. I love the 06 Z06 in Lemans Blue.

Andreas · Post by **Andreas** » 08 Nov 2005, 12:50

Volvo

Fadeproof · Post by **Fadeproof** » 08 Nov 2005, 15:03

James31278 wrote:It's little bit exotic.

i dont think so... the ferrari 550 maranello, testarossa, 360 spider, Lamborghini gallardo, diablo, porsche 911 turbo are all exotics...... but to me the BMW M3 is not an exotic...

James31278 · Post by **James31278** » 08 Nov 2005, 15:49

Fadeproof wrote:
James31278 wrote:It's little bit exotic.

i dont think so... the ferrari 550 maranello, testarossa, 360 spider, Lamborghini gallardo, diablo, porsche 911 turbo are all exotics...... but to me the BMW M3 is not an exotic...

Ok. I believe its an Exotic. Alot of history behind all of those including BMW.

TheNoobofFerraris · Post by **TheNoobofFerraris** » 08 Nov 2005, 19:35

Bmw really hasn't gotten hold of the "Exotic" line yet. They are more of the fast luxury cars or something like that along with the jaguar (but jaguar made the Xj-220 you see). Now Mercedes has the SLR and the Clk-Gtr witch are pretty much like the exotics, but once I see BMW construct a car that can hit 0-60 in 3.7 seconds and a top speed of 205+ then that would be an exotic. And hey if I don't know about a secret bmw that has hit this, then please correct me.

James31278 · Post by **James31278** » 08 Nov 2005, 19:47

TheNoobofFerraris wrote:Bmw really hasn't gotten hold of the "Exotic" line yet. They are more of the fast luxury cars or something like that along with the jaguar (but jaguar made the Xj-220 you see). Now Mercedes has the SLR and the Clk-Gtr witch are pretty much like the exotics, but once I see BMW construct a car that can hit 0-60 in 3.7 seconds and a top speed of 205+ then that would be an exotic. And hey if I don't know about a secret bmw that has hit this, then please correct me.

The Mclaren F1 has a BMW engine in it. The M3 is not a luxury car its a kick Mercedes' ass car.

Fadeproof · Post by **Fadeproof** » 09 Nov 2005, 01:31

I really doubt that the M3 could beat the SLR Mclaren in any kind of race.... so its not like the M3 can beat any mercedes like yuou said..... well thats what i think you said anyway.

Dont get me wrong, i really like the MBW M3... and i will get it when i get most wanted but to me it just isnt an exotic.

TheNoobFerraris said it is just a fast luxury sedan... that is pretty much the same thing i was going to say next.

James31278 · Post by **James31278** » 09 Nov 2005, 01:36

Fadeproof wrote:I really doubt that the M3 could beat the SLR Mclaren in any kind of race.... so its not like the M3 can beat any mercedes like yuou said..... well thats what i think you said anyway.

Dont get me wrong, i really like the MBW M3... and i will get it when i get most wanted but to me it just isnt an exotic.

TheNoobFerraris said it is just a fast luxury sedan... that is pretty much the same thing i was going to say next.

Didnt say it would beat the SLR, although turboed and a few other parts it probably could since the SLR is crap.

Peter Ferrell · Post by **Peter Ferrell** » 09 Nov 2005, 01:41

But what if the SLR is souped up as well?

Fadeproof · Post by **Fadeproof** » 09 Nov 2005, 01:43

The SLR is not crap. And even with a turbo and a few other parts the M3 would struggle

NOW LETS SEE JUST HOW CRAP THE SLR REALLY IS:

ENGINE---------------------------------
Type: V8, Supercharged
Displacement cu in (cc): 332 (5439)
Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 617(460) / 6500
Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 575(778) / 3250-5000
Redline at RPM: 7000
BRAKES & TIRES-------------------
Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/vented disc
Tires F-R: 255/35 R19 - 295/30 ZR19
Driveline: Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior Dimensions & Weight
Length Ã— Width Ã— Height in: 183.3 Ã— 75.1 Ã— 49.6
Weight lb (kg): 3897 (1768)
POWER------------------------
Acceleration 0-62 mph s: 3.8
Top Speed mph (km/h): 208 (334

HOLY CRAP..... FOR A CAR THAT YOU SAID IS CRAP.... THAT SURE IS WAY BETTER THAN THE M3

Peter Ferrell · Post by **Peter Ferrell** » 09 Nov 2005, 01:47

What about weight distribution?

Fadeproof · Post by **Fadeproof** » 09 Nov 2005, 01:53

For the SLR

Weight Distribution (Front)51
Weight Distribution (Rear)49

I couldnt find it for the M3...

I just dont see how anyone can think the M3 can compete with the SLR on performance

James31278 · Post by **James31278** » 09 Nov 2005, 02:00

you must be a Merc fan to go out of your way to promote that nearly dead car.

TheNoobofFerraris · Post by **TheNoobofFerraris** » 09 Nov 2005, 02:02

James is just hating on the car because he can't afford it.

I'm guessing most of the people here can't afford it anyway...

James31278 · Post by **James31278** » 09 Nov 2005, 02:07

TheNoobofFerraris wrote:James is just hating on the car because he can't afford it.

I'm guessing most of the people here can't afford it anyway...

Come out of the ghetto hating on is not a real term. I don't like the car, even if I could afford it I would pass it up for a better vehicle.

Fadeproof · Post by **Fadeproof** » 09 Nov 2005, 03:07

James31278 wrote: you must be a Merc fan to go out of your way to promote that nearly dead car.

Explain one thing to me... how the hell is it nearly dead.

It is in almost every racing game that is getting released of late, its in alot of music clips so i really dont see how it is dead

TheNoobofFerraris · Post by **TheNoobofFerraris** » 09 Nov 2005, 06:58

James31278 wrote:
TheNoobofFerraris wrote:James is just hating on the car because he can't afford it.

I'm guessing most of the people here can't afford it anyway...
Come out of the ghetto hating on is not a real term. I don't like the car, even if I could afford it I would pass it up for a better vehicle.

Well then if you can't be happy with that car I don't think you would be happy with any other car becuause those people put alot of hard work in designing the SLR, Skyline Boy.

Kid Cro · Post by **Kid Cro** » 09 Nov 2005, 11:58

Peter Ferrell wrote:Whoa... In my opinion, that should shoot down any doubts about the BMW not being an exotic... 0-60 in 4.8? THat's almost in the league of the Corvette. Almost.

Well peter says that M3 is almost in leauge of the Corvette. Looking to that there are leagues of exotics???

Peter Ferrell · Post by **Peter Ferrell** » 10 Nov 2005, 03:39

Sure why not... The base model Corvette (in Canada at least) I believe read could do 0-60 in 4.3? Well adding on the Z06 performance package, maybe high 3's low 4's? (0-60). And, as pointed out earlier, the SLR does 0-60 in 3.7... Tell me now, is that not exotic? And, as with every car, there is a competitor for it. Hence, the "league" of exotics.

James31278 · Post by **James31278** » 10 Nov 2005, 04:11

Assuming this is correct C&D says the 06 Z06 does 60 in 3.6 seconds. Hahaha a tiny bit quicker than some people's favorite SLR. Slow Losing Reject.

arabnight · Post by **arabnight** » 10 Nov 2005, 05:24

James31278 wrote:Assuming this is correct C&D says the 06 Z06 does 60 in 3.6 seconds. Hahaha a tiny bit quicker than some people's favorite SLR. Slow Losing Reject.

is it but still the slr is cool lol

Post by **TheStig** » 10 Nov 2005, 08:18

0-60 says nothing, it doesn't make it a good car. the SLR is a much better car then a Corvette ever will be. the SLR has much better handling and stability it got fenominal braking power.
The tested the brakes of the SLR in Top Gear and it could stop in the legal limit for a car that drives 60 MPH but they drove at 120 mhp (200kmh) and it stop within that distance (wich was really short for a car doing that speed!)

And the SLR is not a real merc it is basicly a McLaren with a Merc engine and some merc components, and merc luxury.
It is still a brittish build car.

xHaZxMaTx · Post by **xHaZxMaTx** » 10 Nov 2005, 09:10

120-0mph in the same distance as 60-0? That's crazy!

NFSUnlimited.net

What cars do you want to drive in NFS:MW the most...??

when you get need for speed most wanted, what type of car do you want to drive in the most....