What's the best Car? :D
-
James31278
- Banned
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: 10 Apr 2005, 22:34
I disagreeenvee wrote:For me the best car in MW is the Dodge Viper and I forbit anyone to disagree with this statement..
no really I do....
IMO the Viper and the Corvette handle like a 10 ton brick, the Viper has a horrible 1st gear so getting of the line is a pain. I won both the corvette and the Viper in the careermode but didn't like em both.
I like the handling of the Gallardo and the 911 Turbo S but the Mercs aren't bad eighter (once upgraded) haven't tried the RX7 yet.
- NFSBLUECIVIC
- Professional

- Posts: 1108
- Joined: 16 Nov 2004, 01:38
- Location: Smithfield Utah U.S.A.
-
James31278
- Banned
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: 10 Apr 2005, 22:34
The RX-7 is pretty nimble, kinda loose but its monster in the right hands.TheStig wrote:I disagreeenvee wrote:For me the best car in MW is the Dodge Viper and I forbit anyone to disagree with this statement..![]()
no really I do....
IMO the Viper and the Corvette handle like a 10 ton brick, the Viper has a horrible 1st gear so getting of the line is a pain. I won both the corvette and the Viper in the careermode but didn't like em both.
I like the handling of the Gallardo and the 911 Turbo S but the Mercs aren't bad eighter (once upgraded) haven't tried the RX7 yet.
-
James31278
- Banned
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: 10 Apr 2005, 22:34
-
James31278
- Banned
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: 10 Apr 2005, 22:34
- Fadeproof
- Professional

- Posts: 1944
- Joined: 26 Sep 2005, 18:08
- Location: Melbourne (Australia) Ride: '90 VN commodore
everyone i know who has the game... (3 people) all think the lamborghini murchilargo (or how ever you spell it) is crap... but i think it is very good. I brought one yesterday and i think it is really good.
The only problem is the reversing... it takes ages to get going when your reversing and that has got me busted once.
The only problem is the reversing... it takes ages to get going when your reversing and that has got me busted once.

I forbided to disagree mainly becose I ment that for my driving style the Viper is the best , i've mastered it and tuned it a bit as for brick-like handeling it just needs a bit of practice .I'll tell you this thiugh the carrera GT handles like a 10 tonn brick and I will kick the sh*t out of an RX7 on my Dodge . The Gallardos handeling is supperb I agree.TheStig wrote:I disagreeenvee wrote:For me the best car in MW is the Dodge Viper and I forbit anyone to disagree with this statement..![]()
no really I do....
IMO the Viper and the Corvette handle like a 10 ton brick, the Viper has a horrible 1st gear so getting of the line is a pain. I won both the corvette and the Viper in the careermode but didn't like em both.
I like the handling of the Gallardo and the 911 Turbo S but the Mercs aren't bad eighter (once upgraded) haven't tried the RX7 yet.
- DarrenR21373
- Professional

- Posts: 1102
- Joined: 23 Oct 2004, 15:11
- Location: Little Britain
I'm slightly biased towards the FD and SE, but lets face the facts.
The SL is strictly a boulevard crusier, not an exotic. It weighs 4000 pounds, while the FD RX-7 weighs 2830, and the SE RX-8 weighs 2940. Come on. Sure, the SL has 7 gears, but it is hooked up to an automatic, so one can have a smooth, fuel-efficient ride, while the FD and SE have slick-shifting 6-speed manuals for performance driving. Also, which are cheaper: the Mazda or the Mercedes? Sure, one starts with a bit more straight-line performance, but for a 43000-44000 premium over the other. Keep in mind, you can modify the FD or SE to better avail than modifying the SL. IMHO, that's why the RX-8 or RX-7 are better than buying an SL (from an unbiased point of view).
Kid Cro, RX-7s and RX-8s are the best!!!!
The SL is strictly a boulevard crusier, not an exotic. It weighs 4000 pounds, while the FD RX-7 weighs 2830, and the SE RX-8 weighs 2940. Come on. Sure, the SL has 7 gears, but it is hooked up to an automatic, so one can have a smooth, fuel-efficient ride, while the FD and SE have slick-shifting 6-speed manuals for performance driving. Also, which are cheaper: the Mazda or the Mercedes? Sure, one starts with a bit more straight-line performance, but for a 43000-44000 premium over the other. Keep in mind, you can modify the FD or SE to better avail than modifying the SL. IMHO, that's why the RX-8 or RX-7 are better than buying an SL (from an unbiased point of view).
Kid Cro, RX-7s and RX-8s are the best!!!!
C2D T7500 2.2 ghz| 256 MB NVIDIA Quadro FX570m|160 GB 7200 RPM|2 GB RAM- my laptop
Hi all!
I am still learning the game, but I can already tell you this: there are only 2 cars in MW that matter in Offline Circuit, The Porsche Carrera GT and the Lotus Elise. The first one rules fastest circuits. The second one rules the twisted ones. Carrera GT is probably the best car, overall, and with right setup maybe it can equal the Elise, but the Elise can't battle the Carrera GT in it's strongest circuits.
Like I said, I am still learning and I still counldn't put a together a decent practise, but on Ironwoods for instance, I did 38.2s with my Elise (using all 7 junkman parts; no NOS; no Speedbreaker; no Custom setup - I used default setup, with all settings in 0). Try to beat that, in those conditions, with any other car.
Cya!
I am still learning the game, but I can already tell you this: there are only 2 cars in MW that matter in Offline Circuit, The Porsche Carrera GT and the Lotus Elise. The first one rules fastest circuits. The second one rules the twisted ones. Carrera GT is probably the best car, overall, and with right setup maybe it can equal the Elise, but the Elise can't battle the Carrera GT in it's strongest circuits.
Like I said, I am still learning and I still counldn't put a together a decent practise, but on Ironwoods for instance, I did 38.2s with my Elise (using all 7 junkman parts; no NOS; no Speedbreaker; no Custom setup - I used default setup, with all settings in 0). Try to beat that, in those conditions, with any other car.
Cya!
Use car with FWD for running from police. Coz you can turn quick and start better.Fadeproof wrote:everyone i know who has the game... (3 people) all think the lamborghini murchilargo (or how ever you spell it) is crap... but i think it is very good. I brought one yesterday and i think it is really good.
The only problem is the reversing... it takes ages to get going when your reversing and that has got me busted once.
User deactivated: Habitual rule breaking; Abject lack of respect for the community.
- Fadeproof
- Professional

- Posts: 1944
- Joined: 26 Sep 2005, 18:08
- Location: Melbourne (Australia) Ride: '90 VN commodore
for runnung the police i usually use either the mustang because it is the best it destroying the road blocks, but has to much torque and just spins its wheels in tight situations.
or i use my DB9, not so good at destroying roadblocks, gets through em but doesnt usualy immobializa the cars ,but has the best take off. doesnt spin its wheels at all.
or i use my DB9, not so good at destroying roadblocks, gets through em but doesnt usualy immobializa the cars ,but has the best take off. doesnt spin its wheels at all.

-
James31278
- Banned
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: 10 Apr 2005, 22:34
RX-7 is actually 2826lbs but thats 4 pounds. The RX-8 is also 3,029lbs. Curb weight as in with no one or anything it in. RX-7 and RX-8 are absolutely better than some pos mercedes. Fuel Efficient is something mercs aren't. The average SL merc has at least 400hp or more. I think to be more precise it has 450 to 500 horsepower.SkeeteRX7 wrote:I'm slightly biased towards the FD and SE, but lets face the facts.
The SL is strictly a boulevard crusier, not an exotic. It weighs 4000 pounds, while the FD RX-7 weighs 2830, and the SE RX-8 weighs 2940. Come on. Sure, the SL has 7 gears, but it is hooked up to an automatic, so one can have a smooth, fuel-efficient ride, while the FD and SE have slick-shifting 6-speed manuals for performance driving. Also, which are cheaper: the Mazda or the Mercedes? Sure, one starts with a bit more straight-line performance, but for a 43000-44000 premium over the other. Keep in mind, you can modify the FD or SE to better avail than modifying the SL. IMHO, that's why the RX-8 or RX-7 are better than buying an SL (from an unbiased point of view).
Kid Cro, RX-7s and RX-8s are the best!!!!
Yea, i said that.
James31278 wrote:RX-7 is actually 2826lbs but thats 4 pounds. The RX-8 is also 3,029lbs. Curb weight as in with no one or anything it in. RX-7 and RX-8 are absolutely better than some pos mercedes. Fuel Efficient is something mercs aren't. The average SL merc has at least 400hp or more. I think to be more precise it has 450 to 500 horsepower.SkeeteRX7 wrote:I'm slightly biased towards the FD and SE, but lets face the facts.
The SL is strictly a boulevard crusier, not an exotic. It weighs 4000 pounds, while the FD RX-7 weighs 2830, and the SE RX-8 weighs 2940. Come on. Sure, the SL has 7 gears, but it is hooked up to an automatic, so one can have a smooth, fuel-efficient ride, while the FD and SE have slick-shifting 6-speed manuals for performance driving. Also, which are cheaper: the Mazda or the Mercedes? Sure, one starts with a bit more straight-line performance, but for a 43000-44000 premium over the other. Keep in mind, you can modify the FD or SE to better avail than modifying the SL. IMHO, that's why the RX-8 or RX-7 are better than buying an SL (from an unbiased point of view).
Kid Cro, RX-7s and RX-8s are the best!!!!
I'm sorry, talking about JDM version from Gran Turismo 4. But still, can you clutch kick around a hairpin with an SL? It's not meant for street racing, as I said before, it's a boulevard crusier, not a racer.
C2D T7500 2.2 ghz| 256 MB NVIDIA Quadro FX570m|160 GB 7200 RPM|2 GB RAM- my laptop
-
James31278
- Banned
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: 10 Apr 2005, 22:34
Re: Yea, i said that.
The JDM version is pretty much identical to our version only they left the backseat in. I would say the Merc is a posermobile for rich assh*les with no brains and alot of money. you know, someone very ugly to needs a car like that to get girls because by himself he has no redeeming qualities. The Mazdas are a real man's car.SkeeteRX7 wrote:James31278 wrote:RX-7 is actually 2826lbs but thats 4 pounds. The RX-8 is also 3,029lbs. Curb weight as in with no one or anything it in. RX-7 and RX-8 are absolutely better than some pos mercedes. Fuel Efficient is something mercs aren't. The average SL merc has at least 400hp or more. I think to be more precise it has 450 to 500 horsepower.SkeeteRX7 wrote:I'm slightly biased towards the FD and SE, but lets face the facts.
The SL is strictly a boulevard crusier, not an exotic. It weighs 4000 pounds, while the FD RX-7 weighs 2830, and the SE RX-8 weighs 2940. Come on. Sure, the SL has 7 gears, but it is hooked up to an automatic, so one can have a smooth, fuel-efficient ride, while the FD and SE have slick-shifting 6-speed manuals for performance driving. Also, which are cheaper: the Mazda or the Mercedes? Sure, one starts with a bit more straight-line performance, but for a 43000-44000 premium over the other. Keep in mind, you can modify the FD or SE to better avail than modifying the SL. IMHO, that's why the RX-8 or RX-7 are better than buying an SL (from an unbiased point of view).
Kid Cro, RX-7s and RX-8s are the best!!!!
I'm sorry, talking about JDM version from Gran Turismo 4. But still, can you clutch kick around a hairpin with an SL? It's not meant for street racing, as I said before, it's a boulevard crusier, not a racer.
- TheNoobofFerraris
- Professional

- Posts: 1070
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 18:31
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
-
James31278
- Banned
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: 10 Apr 2005, 22:34
Mine and a few million others' opinion. As for the skill-less driving mercedes poser stuff thats not opinion thats fact.TheNoobofFerraris wrote:But thats your opion, in this case I totally disagree. Wahtever car you choose is "your" car. In my case I like Porsches then Ferraris, Lamborghinis, and then Mercedes and then comes the longer like like the Pagani Zonda and stuff.
(btw thats ordered from Porsche to Merc)
- The Flying Dragon
- Turbo Charged

- Posts: 211
- Joined: 21 Nov 2004, 23:42
- Location: London [UK]





