Which car should I buy and why?!?!?

Discuss your favourite cars, racing or non-racing
Fredstar
Ricer
Ricer
Posts: 25
Joined: 07 Dec 2003, 04:45

Which car should I buy and why?!?!?

Post by Fredstar »

I've recently come across this problem, which one of these two cars should I buy:

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII MR FQ-340
Subaru WRX STi
User avatar
Stereo
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 3942
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 19:33
Location: Outside your window

Post by Stereo »

If you like a cool looking car then the lancer! If you like heavy and powerful cars then buy a WRX.
Image
User avatar
VPNeverLoser
Drift King
Drift King
Posts: 677
Joined: 05 Apr 2004, 03:14
Location: SouthPole

Post by VPNeverLoser »

i would get the WRX since it is more powerful and a really good car to rally and other stuff :wink:
User avatar
Sp3aK
UMP Owner
UMP Owner
Posts: 724
Joined: 28 Jan 2004, 23:38
Location: Durham, NC

Post by Sp3aK »

Both cars have their own qualities. I personally would take the Evo over the STi based on looks and what not. Plus you don't see as many Evo's around here, so you'd be more unique looking. Anyways... I've heard from several people that the STi is a straight up beast all around. My dad drove one and he said it wasn't the fastest car he's driven(he's been a mechanic for 20yrs ;) ), but it was one of the best handling cars he's ever seen. He's driven all sorts of cars and he's very experienced as a mechanic so I trust his judgement.

I heard there was a new rally edition of the STi out, go for that :)

But a 300hp handling monster sounds good to me. Plus you can always mod it some more ;)
Drewb99
Drift King
Drift King
Posts: 689
Joined: 30 May 2004, 02:50

Post by Drewb99 »

WRX STi

I've heard nasty stories about body rust on some of the imported Evos, not to mension the recent corporate state of Mitsubishi Motors as a company-
Mitsubishi Corp. dropped from 10th to 389th with $14,116 million while Mitsui & Co. fell from 11th to 177th with $26,385 million.
Whoopsie :P
http://www.aiada.org/article.asp?id=19610&cat=Industry

I don't know if Mitsu would be around long enough to even hold their warranty up.
User avatar
Stereo
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 3942
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 19:33
Location: Outside your window

Post by Stereo »

I you can afford, get a Toyota Celica. (If you like sporty cars) Toyota is a great company and makes great cars.
Image
User avatar
TheStig
NFSUnlimited Staff
NFSUnlimited Staff
Posts: 8736
Joined: 30 Jan 2004, 02:40
Location: The Netherlands

Post by TheStig »

and you get anough money left to get some nice performance parts...

but I personally would go for the EVO VIII, looks better IMO...

but that's just me...
Image
User avatar
UrQuattro
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 3013
Joined: 20 Dec 2003, 04:52
Location: Banana Republic

Post by UrQuattro »

Is this your first car? Can you drive a ~330hp 4wd car? You planning to buy it now, or like you just thinking you will sometime someday?

Anyhow, Evo is the better pick afaik.

@ Stereo - if the guy says he wants to buy Evo/WRX Sti, he can definately afford a Celica, may be two Celicas.
Image
User avatar
Stereo
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 3942
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 19:33
Location: Outside your window

Post by Stereo »

whoops sorry how much money he can afford i don't know.

@Fredstar: How much money u wanna spend? Whats the maximum amount?
Image
User avatar
Sp3aK
UMP Owner
UMP Owner
Posts: 724
Joined: 28 Jan 2004, 23:38
Location: Durham, NC

Post by Sp3aK »

Stereo all your going based upon is looks. The rest of us can actually drive.
User avatar
Stereo
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 3942
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 19:33
Location: Outside your window

Post by Stereo »

nope i'm going upon performance too. I'm just asking how much money...
Image
User avatar
Sweeper
Drift King
Drift King
Posts: 539
Joined: 11 May 2004, 11:39
Location: Norway, Levanger

Post by Sweeper »

I'd take the WRX personally if the choice came down to that, even though I like the Evo.
Why? Because the Evo 8 looks crappy in my eyes, I liked the Evo 4 and 5 a lot more than the 8.
Maybe not so powerful, but the front fender lights screams beast at me.
User avatar
TheStig
NFSUnlimited Staff
NFSUnlimited Staff
Posts: 8736
Joined: 30 Jan 2004, 02:40
Location: The Netherlands

Post by TheStig »

Sp3aK wrote:Stereo all your going based upon is looks. The rest of us can actually drive.
yes and soo what...

that you have a licence doesn't mean you can drive... :?

and the rest of us also go for looks and stats cause simple we (most of us) never driven one of the cars.
So our opinions are just as worthless as Stereo's!

Just opinions of style!

think about it before trying to take out a younger kid!
Image
_SHARKY_
Ricer
Ricer
Posts: 17
Joined: 29 Jul 2004, 11:16
Location: Greece

Post by _SHARKY_ »

I prefer better the EVOIII.
User avatar
^Sparco^
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 4293
Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 01:56
Location: VaLLaDoLiD (SPaiN)

Post by ^Sparco^ »

uhm... I only have to say I like the visually of this Evo version (yeah, it is the MR FQ-340) :
Attachments
EVO8a.jpg
(99.58 KiB) Downloaded 1103 times
User avatar
Stereo
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 3942
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 19:33
Location: Outside your window

Post by Stereo »

yeah it looks so cool but not in gray paint. Thats my opinion tho. Pearlescent dark-blue would look better IMO.
Image
User avatar
UrQuattro
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 3013
Joined: 20 Dec 2003, 04:52
Location: Banana Republic

Post by UrQuattro »

Almost every magazine I've read, everyone was like 'I want to give Subaru the higher score but I just can't because EVO is more of a sports car that it tries to be'.
Image
User avatar
JD
Turbo Charged
Turbo Charged
Posts: 92
Joined: 22 Dec 2003, 23:27
Location: Bosnia

Post by JD »

I'd go with the EVO as well.
leg0man
Ricer
Ricer
Posts: 8
Joined: 20 Jun 2004, 09:37

Post by leg0man »

i don't like the look of the lancer at all
couple things i've heard about the EVO/mitsu is that they're really picky about warranty service if you do any mods, and that the EVO runs high boost stock, things don't hold up so well under modding.. it's a lot easier to get big power modding the subie.

i doubt he wants opinions just on looks, he wants opinions from people who actually know things about cars, whether from driving them or reading magazines and reviews. even if he didn't say how much he's spending, anyone with a clue about cars knows an EVO and a WRX STI are a lot higher on the food chain than a Celica.
User avatar
PSZeTa
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 4123
Joined: 07 Feb 2004, 19:26
Location: 30-12-1900

Post by PSZeTa »

You can just take a normal Evo 8, since the MR version is a 'Mitsubishi Racing' one, but it isn't much different.

I've seen the Evo and the WRX on Top Gear, and that WRX got whacked big. Mitsubishi's Active Yaw Control owns. Simply go trough the corner with no fear. :lol: The WRX understeered like a maniac. And put them next to each other, and the Mitsubishi owns the WRX again at a sprint.
Image
Fredstar
Ricer
Ricer
Posts: 25
Joined: 07 Dec 2003, 04:45

Post by Fredstar »

Hey guys, thanx for the replies, yeah I saw the test on Top Gear as well, the Evo VIII (MR FQ-280) here costs $5000AUD more than the STi so I guess its the racing stuff thats pre-fitted into the Evo that makes it a tad more (is it?!?!?) how good are those big pre-fitted Enkei rims?
Anyway, the budget is around that $56000-$62000AUD, I really like the grunt these two cars produce but also looking at how realiable they are.
I don't really mind the differences in looks (they both look great) but I just want to find out from the experts here on what they think.
User avatar
marshallpre1
Drift King
Drift King
Posts: 872
Joined: 16 Dec 2003, 03:11
Location: Binghamton University

Post by marshallpre1 »

get evo cause theyre hot, but a supra would be my #1 choice...
Image
Drewb99
Drift King
Drift King
Posts: 689
Joined: 30 May 2004, 02:50

Post by Drewb99 »

On that Top Gear show, was it the baseline WRX or the WRX STi?
Fredstar
Ricer
Ricer
Posts: 25
Joined: 07 Dec 2003, 04:45

Post by Fredstar »

Drewb99 wrote:On that Top Gear show, was it the baseline WRX or the WRX STi?
It was the Evo FQ-300 vs. WRX STi
User avatar
Grez~Supra_RZ-S
Valued Member
Valued Member
Posts: 3092
Joined: 02 Dec 2003, 21:46
Location: Hair Salon

Post by Grez~Supra_RZ-S »

Mitsubishi are infamous for their bad customer skills and cheap build quality. However, I would still personally opt for an Evo8.

But it all depends on what you want the car for.
*sig removed for being too big. limitations are 550x120px & 50kb*
Post Reply

Return to “The Cars”